Opportunity Cost and Past Performance
At present, over 10,000 ETH sits idle in the treasury, generating no yield and contributing minimally to the growth of the ecosystem. Allocating a portion of this to yield-generating strategies is in line with treasury management best practices.
Since May, the ATMC ETH-denominated strategies have generated 43.4 ETH, utilizing AAVE, Fluid, Camelot, and Lido. Performance and a detailed breakdown of the ETH allocations, as well as other treasury strategies, can be seen here.
Assuming a prospective allocation of 8500 ETH and a conservative ETH-denominated yield of ~2.4% (illustrative figure based on the 30-day average annualized yield for existing ATMC strategies), the DAO is foregoing approximately 204 ETH annually, which is $891k at current market prices. Even at the lowest 30-day average annualized yield rate of 2.04% (recorded July 15th), the projected opportunity cost of letting this ETH sit unallocated is 173 ETH, or $756k at current market prices.
From a treasury management perspective, maintaining a large passive ETH position without a corresponding yield strategy is suboptimal, especially when there exists a variety of deployments that would be appropriate to allocate it to, including but not limited to native staking, restaking, DEX liquidity provision, and lending market supply.
DeFi Ecosystem Support
This proposal is in direct strategic alignment with the current DRIP campaign, fulfilling treasury management’s dual mandate of:
A major goal of the Arbitrum DRIP program is to spur activity within the broader Arbitrum DeFi ecosystem, initially focusing on boosting leveraged looping strategies within DeFi utilizing yield-bearing collateral. Decisions regarding these funds will prioritize supporting these initiatives where possible, deploying productive capital across various venues, though this will not take absolute precedent over existing considerations regarding risk, liquidity, partnership opportunities, sustainable yields, etc.
Some indicative examples of DRIP-aligned treasury strategies would be supplying unstaked ETH to lending markets, or staking ETH with LST/LRT providers, and exploring adding DEX liquidity across native ETH and LST/LRTs pools. With some of these strategies, we can ensure that users who are looking to participate in DRIP have ample liquidity, and we can even make an impact by stabilizing lending market utilization rates, reducing borrowing costs or slippage.
As with prior deployments, we intend to communicate with prospective partner protocols to negotiate terms beneficial to the DAO or reduced costs on any deployments when possible or appropriate.
Entropy proposes that the new tranche of 8500 ETH be used in a variety of generally lower-risk, ecosystem-supporting protocols, including but not limited to
The 8500 ETH is not intended to mirror the existing treasury strategy deployments, unless extenuating circumstances indicate these to be undoubtedly the best option to support the ecosystem and generate risk-adjusted returns. The DAO’s wallets will be blacklisted from receiving any possible DRIP incentives.
For this proposal, we will not be conducting an open RFP process for protocols to apply for funding. Entropy will proactively engage with protocols providing services that align with our strategic goals. To have full confidence in the deployment of this capital, evaluations of various strategies will heavily take into account criteria such as protocol maturity, ecosystem impact, yield sustainability, and economic and smart contract risk.
As structured in the ATMC proposal, the elected OAT body will maintain full ability to approve or deny granular selection decisions. No allocation can be made unilaterally by Entropy. Funds will be sent to and custodied by the Arbitrum Foundation. Rebalancing needs will be examined as part of our normal treasury management reporting cadence, considering liquidity constraints, yield conditions, or shifts in ecosystem needs.
Given that the 8500 ETH requested represents a material portion of the non-ARB, unallocated treasury funds, capital preservation and long-term impact remain primary priorities. The following benchmarks guide Entropy’s allocation strategy:
Entropy recognizes and agrees with delegates that at certain times a deployment to support ecosystem growth should be prioritized over a pure yield strategy. Our team weighs growth opportunities against foregone yield based on a few factors:
https://tally.xyz/gov/arbitrum/proposal/57495998481040869152703890521939307107269690440073097268210566577740258992963