[ARFC ADDENDUM] Updating rules for ARFC and TEMP CHECK Proposals

Voting ended 23 days agoSucceeded

Summary

Before a proposal is brought to a vote by a 3rd party, the proposer must indicate they wish to submit that proposal a vote.

Motivation

Recent events have highlighted this gap in the proposal rules. Submitters should have time to revise proposals and should not have their name attached to a proposal they have not chosen to submit.

I am open to consider other proposal related rules that the community thinks should be included.

Details

The proposer must indicate they wish to have a proposal submitted before a 3rd party can submit it for a vote, such as by replying “formally submitting” on the proposal’s forum thread.

Specification

As this proposal pertains to governance guidelines, it does not require any on-chain action or protocol change.

Disclaimer

Codeknight is not presenting this ARFC on behalf of any third party and is not compensated for creating this ARFC.

Next Steps

If consensus is reached on this ARFC, escalate this proposal to the Snapshot stage.
If the Snapshot outcome is YAE, this proposal will be considered canon, and the guidelines will be adopted.

Copyright