Launch Round 2 Parcel Rolls

Author: Dr Wagmi (Dr Wagmi#6629) Gotchi ID: 16635 Discourse Thread: https://dao.aavegotchi.com/t/second-round-vrf-rolls-for-parcels/4602

I propose that we implement the round 2 parcel roll by early February.

The predominant discussions and farming emissions design specifically outlined a re-roll at 6 months. Many of the most invested and long-standing members of the Gotchiverse specifically designed their farming strategy around this shared understanding. Numerous DAO members helped contribute to the current recipes and mathematics specifically with that timetable in mind. There are additional reasons to implement the round 2 rolls:

• We have an opportunity to meet our commitments as a DAO, even if the Gotchiverse deliverable of a great battle is not quite ready
• We can set a precedent for supporting asset holders and contributing members of our ecosystem
• We will encourage further investment from current community members and be a more attractive investment to newcomers if we establish a pattern of reliability
• Gotchiverse land owners have been especially harmed by macro market conditions and gotchiverse-specific market trends. This is one small effort to support those investing time and resources into the Gotchiverse
• We are pushing for a higher farming to channeling ratio of alchemica emissions which this would support
• It is more attractive to invest in the alchemica spending competition (and land in general) with a definitive round 2 plan
• It is a targeted nerf/rug to those most supporting the ecosystem to intentionally delay rerolls
• The hopeful time frame of an April Great Battle is also not definitive and susceptible to delays given the complexity of the current roadmap and desired focus on PVP

There are notable potential cons to consider:

• Increased overall alchemica emissions if invested farmers have round 2 alchemica to farm
• Mismatch of new rounds to the anticipated lore of a Great Battle followed by the new round

On the 1/8 DAO call, coderdan specifically stated it is a small dev lift to implement the next round of re-rolls, so this should not cause any major delays or change in shipping priorities. As thoroughly discussed in DAO discussion, both paths are reasonable, and I appreciate the formal DAO temperature check with this sig prop.

DW