Author: Nestor / 0x4eDb4161D16c89b71Aec027930a943c3d4cf0777 / #5583
Discussion: https://discord.com/channels/732491344970383370/1468690009849598078
Date: February 19, 2026
The recent compensation poll had a high turnout, but the vote was split between runner-up "Abstain" (36.21%) and winner "10,000 GHST" (44.36%). Also GHST-value was assumed with $0.3 per 1 GHST calculated by a smoothing 180-day-average.
Poll Question:
"Should future quarterly signer compensation be
defined in a fixed GHST-amount or
defined in USDC (stable value) and paid out in GHST (variably)
and if it is the latter, should it be as an equivalent
according to the GHST price on a fixed payout day or
to the 7-day average GHST-price (fixed data-source)?
Poll Answer Options:
Yes – define in USDC, pay in GHST (variably) at payout-day price (source)
Yes – define in USDC, pay in GHST (variably) at 7-day average price (source)
No – keep everything purely in GHST (fixed amount, status quo, POLL #1)
Abstain / No preference
Rationale
USDC definition protects purchasing power against GHST volatility while keeping GHST as the actual payout token (ecosystem-aligned). Results will guide the upcoming Election voting.
Voting
Duration: 10 days
Strategy: Weighted Voting
Vote now → The results of this POLL (accompanying the SIGPROP) will inform the Core Proposal of the Signer Election!