• © Goverland Inc. 2026
  • v1.0.8
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
AlexDAOAlexDAOby0x04Fb1E146a6bF87Ec17A928A315cA574D39BF2D50x04Fb…F2D5

This hatred would involve the hatred of the arts.

Voting ended over 4 years agoFailed

This hatred would involve the hatred of the arts. Nevertheless, in churchmen, luxury is wrong, except in connection with representations and ceremonies. It seems to reveal habits which have very little that is charitable about them. An opulent priest is a contradiction. The priest must keep close to the poor. Now, can one come in contact incessantly night and day with all this distress, all these misfortunes, and this poverty, without having about one's own person a little of that misery, like the dust of labor? Is it possible to imagine a man near a brazier who is not warm? Can one imagine a workman who is working near a furnace, and who has neither a singed hair, nor blackened nails, nor a drop of sweat, nor a speck of ashes on his face? The first proof of charity in the priest, in the bishop especially, is poverty.

Off-Chain Vote

yes
0 0%
no
0 0%
Download mobile app to vote

Timeline

Dec 20, 2021Proposal created
Dec 20, 2021Proposal vote started
Dec 23, 2021Proposal vote ended
Oct 26, 2023Proposal updated