dappOS LTIPP Council Recommended Proposal

Link to Application

https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/dappos-ltipp-application-draft/21840

Council - 3/3 Yes Votes

Feedback

404 DAO Feedback dappOS presented a concise application, but they scored decently across most sections in the rubric. Their product has also seen past success with incentives through GMX’s grant program. While their milestone section and KPIs could’ve been more detailed, we feel that their distribution mechanism and the novelty of their product are strong enough reasons to support this application.

Wintermute Feedback dappOS’s application was good and scored well across various criteria. They seem to have a pretty large user base (hard to verify such data) that is active across multiple chains and protocols, therefore, acting as a nice funnel to the Arbitrum ecosystem. Their goals, KPIs, and milestones are all clear in their purpose and their justification of grant size is sufficient and reasonable given their goals and level of activity. Our main concerns are that they are already receiving funding from STIP via GMX’s grant program which could be seen as double dipping and it makes it hard to fully understand how organic the current metrics are. Furthermore, their incentive mechanism does not provide any new data and mimics what has previously been done for GMX. Overall, despite these concerns, their ability to generate strong activity seems sufficient enough to receive their requested grant size. We will be supporting this application.

Karel Feedback Vote FOR dappOS' proposal.

Good proposal and scored moderately well on rubric. KPIs/milestones are realistic with existing figures and grant size is well justified. Lacking in data availability (or accessiblility of it) across chains (would be good to have source of truth across all chains/protocols). Would have been good to have more information on "new campaigns on popular dApp partners" re: stickiness.