Uniswap LTIPP Council Recommended Proposal

Link to Application

https://forum.arbitrum.foundation/t/uniswap-ltipp-application-draft/21848

Council - 3/3 Yes Votes

Feedback

Wintermute Feedback) Uniswap’s application was solid but mostly scored well due to the history of the protocol, its usage, and the value it brings to the Arbitrum ecosystem. We are not typically supportive of pure LM efforts, however, Gauntlet and the Uniswap DAO have previously proven their ability to target pools correctly in order to achieve longer-lasting results. The application provided sufficient justifications of KPIs and objectives, however, we would’ve liked to have seen some more specifics around target pools, APRs, and milestones. We will be supporting this application.

GMX Feedback) I’m supportive of approving Uniswap’s grant application. They are proven in the space and one of the leading innovators. Being a part of helping Uniswap grow their development can only be beneficial for Arbitrum. The proposed objectives, execution strategy, and KPIs are well-defined, indicating a thorough understanding of the project's goals and how to achieve them. Furthermore, the proposal emphasizes the importance of fostering sustainable growth and innovation within the Arbitrum ecosystem, which aligns with the broader goals of promoting DeFi development and adoption. Overall, this proposal presents a compelling case for why the grant would enable significant positive impact on the Arbitrum network. Just one feedback from our side would be to not use the incentives towards UADP holding 15K ARB as a delegate. It won't make a significant difference; it's better to use that 15K ARB towards incentives.

Karel Feedback) "Vote FOR Uniswap's proposal.

Strong proposal and endorsing as believe this will lead to gowth + sustained activity on Arbitrum. Would have liked to see more specificity around Gauntlet's strategy to select pools + other mechanisms."