[Round 2] USDaf Revenue Allocations

As per community consensus, the outcome of this vote will determine Round 3 (final vote), which will be a FOR/AGAINST/ABSTAIN to enact the winning option of Round 2.

This vote will last 7 days.

Round 1 concluded with Option 5 as the stand-out winning vote: ‘Hybrid Model (1 and 4): A balanced approach to allocate a portion of revenue to USDaf incentives while distributing the remainder to veASF holders, combining growth with direct rewards.’

The following vote is to determine the ratio between Option 1 and Option 4.

As a reminder: Option 1: Direct Revenue Distribution to veASF Holders The fees earned on USDaf would be distributed to veASF holders as USDaf, shown as boosted APRs, linearly correlated to lock-length period, that users can claim from an Asymmetry dashboard. (Note that the team will prioritize the contract + frontend flow for having a “claim” button, but there is a small amount of dev time required to test and get it right)

Option 4: No Change – Continue reinvesting in USDaf Incentives Continue directing all revenue toward liquidity incentives for USDaf.

For this vote the following vote options are available: A: 90% / 10% — Yield-Dominant Almost all revenue to veASF; small portion supports USDaf incentives.

B: 75% / 25% — Yield-First with Growth Support Strong rewards for veASF, but with meaningful reinvestment.

C: 66% / 34% — Two-Thirds to veASF Tilts toward holders while maintaining incentive momentum.

D: 50% / 50% — Balanced Model Equal focus on veASF value accrual and USDaf ecosystem growth.

E: 34% / 66% — Two-Thirds to Incentives Growth-first while still rewarding long-term holders.

F: 25% / 75% — Incentive-Dominant Most revenue reinvested; veASF still receives some yield.

G: 10% / 90% — Growth-Maximizing Prioritizes USDaf liquidity and adoption with minimal direct payouts.