For the proposal to pass, 20% of quorum and >67% FOR votes are needed.
Bancor v3 strategic positioning and maintaining pool competitiveness justify an extension on the LM rewards for the Stable Coin Pools (USDT, USDC, DAI) for the next 8 weeks. The proposal 11 to extend them will most likely fail and the DAO is adamant about giving the LPs in the Stable Coin Pools (USDT, USDC, DAI) a chance to express their vote.
A considerable voting power centralization in the past few days has been observed, enough to warrant a second proposal to be submitted.
LM rewards impact on BNT inflation is minor. After Bancor v3 comes, LM rewards can be reassessed.
The community synergy between Stable Coin LPs and Bancor cannot be overlooked. The second proposal will give Stable Coin LPs and BNT stakers in the protocol the option to stake their vBNT and participate in the voting process.
The protocol doesn't currently allow the LM rewards rate to be altered so these will remain unchanged.
Upon release of the shadow pools, a new LM incentives program may be considered by the DAO. It is a reasonable expectation that DAO will choose to incentivize these pools; however, it is under no obligation to do so.
The launch of Bancor V3 and maintaining pool competitiveness justify an extension on the LM rewards for the stablecoin pool for the next X weeks. The proposal 11 to extend them will most likely fail.
The community was largely surprised by the failure of this proposal (and other large LM extensions) and there is reason to believe that this proposal may pass if pushed again.
It is not feasible to change the duration or amount of LM rewards due to contract complexity. Further, if LM rewards end on a pool, it is very difficult to restart them.
If these pools are going to be renewed, it must happen immediately.
Bancor V3 has been announced and is likely to launch within the 8 week period that these LM rewards would be extended.
Cutting LM on these pools now is a huge change made without knowing the effects of V3.
It is bad business and user experience to make multiple large scale changes to the platform in a short period of time. It is smarter to wait for V3 then reassess.
The effects of LM rewards on inflation have been overstated and the protocol can clearly gain ground in TVL and volume while they are active.
The proposal to renew liquidity mining rewards for the DAI/BNT, USDC/BNT and USDT/BNT pools is being resubmitted over concerns that the DAO's voting power has become significantly centralised, with the top wallets holding a considerable % of the quorum, whilst more than two-thirds of the total vBNT is unstaked and could be voting on Snapshot.
Total Unstaked vBNT: 48,590,025
Unstaked vBNT not in Vortex: 46,634,361
Total vBNT staked for Governance: 13,827,950
Only 22.2% of total vBNT is staked for Governance.
Top two vBNT addresses own 15.9% and 11.2% of quorum, respectively, at a total of 27.1%.

We have seen, through massively increased activity on Twitter, Discord, and Telegram, that there is significant public concern about LINK/wBTC/stablecoin LM rewards failing to pass. The Bancor community was lax and the failure of these proposals caught them by surprise. We have seen a large amount (1.5m and counting) of vBNT stakes in governance since they failed. It is clear that the community wants to vote on this proposal again and there's reason to believe this proposal might pass now.
Due to the design of the liquidity mining contracts, it is very difficult, bordering on impossible, to change the amount or duration of LM rewards once they have been assigned to a pool.
For this reason, we have an all-or-nothing decision in front of us even though it may be more desirable to choose some middle ground.
Due to the design of the contracts, it is very difficult to reinstate LM rewards once they have lapsed. The YFI pool, for example, had LM rewards renewed a month ago which are still not active due to the heavy lifting required by the Bancor team.
This means that if we do not renew these LM rewards immediately, we will not get them back for weeks and perhaps ever once V3 launches.
This decision is urgent and requires an appropriate amount of our attention.
According to Bancor's team recent announcement:
Bancor V3 will be Bancor's largest and most significant upgrade to the protocol.
V3 incorporates community feedback in the past 8 months since v2.1 went live and leverages a brand new discovery in the core AMM design that will dramatically improve the protocol's capital efficiency while reducing friction and costs for users.
V3 unlocks a new way for passive LPs to earn even higher yields on their staked capital while being fully protected against IL. Just set, forget and earn high APRs, with no risk of IL.
The new design will encourage more liquidity to flow into the protocol, and vastly more volume to be processed, driving sustainably high yields for Bancor LPs, and allowing the protocol to collect more revenue.
V3 lays the foundation for Bancor to capture a much larger share of total crypto liquidity and trading revenue.
Bancor is on the cusp of V3. Every indication that we have says that this new version will be a massive change to the ecosystem. Meanwhile, we have seen the protocol continue to build TVL, trading volume, and general momentum on the back of LM rewards.
Removing LM rewards at this time is highly disruptive and flies in the face of every principal of change management 1. It is a change made without understanding what V3 will bring and will put Bancor's users through two significant disruptions in a short period of time. Total protocol changes like V3 should be made during periods of stability, not during the turmoil that would occur in this case.
Some comments:

Figure 1. Bancor monthly volume. May 2021 data doesn't include the last 3 days of the month.



Figure 2. Bancor USDT/USDC/DAI pool daily APR.
| symbol | total_fees |
|---|---|
| DAI | $627,435.88 |
| USDT | $643,455.51 |
| USDC | $954,086.67 |
Figure 3. Fees per stable coin last ~30 days