Proposal: Funding Wolfram Institute Research on DeSci DAO Incentive Alignment

---

TL;DR

Deploy $20,000 worth of $RSC from the BIO treasury to fund the Wolfram Institute research study: “How can DeSci DAOs better align incentives for funding basic science research?”.

The study explores governance and economic mechanisms to improve incentive alignment in decentralized science organizations. It strengthens BIO’s position as a thought leader in DeSci governance, generates open models applicable across BioDAOs, and forges collaboration with Wolfram Institute researchers—renowned for their work in computational frameworks for complex systems.

---

Scientific Relevance

• The Wolfram Institute brings unique expertise in computational social science, mechanism design, and complexity modeling.
• Their formal methods can test incentive structures under simulation before deployment.
• The study builds on “A New Kind of Science Organization”, which highlights the need for new funding architectures that combine open science values with sustainable economic engines.

---

BIO Protocol Synergy

• Strengthens BIO’s governance infrastructure and sets a precedent for robust DAO-level incentive design.
• Outputs (models, simulations, proposed incentive structures) can be integrated into tokenomics experiments across BIO and partner DAOs (VitaDAO, PsyDAO, CerebrumDAO).
• Provides a blueprint for DAO-based funding protocols that balance speculative token upside with reproducible, high-value basic science outputs.

---

DeSci Ecosystem Expansion

• Connects BIO with the Wolfram Institute, a credible global research hub in computational science.
• Positions BIO at the frontier of governance science, a meta-layer critical for scaling all BioDAOs.
• Builds credibility as BIO shifts from funding isolated projects to also shaping the “operating system” of DeSci.

---

Strategic Rationale

• Thought Leadership: BIO becomes an early backer of rigorous governance R&D.
• Cross-DAO Impact: Outputs are reusable across many DAOs, magnifying ROI.
• Strategic Alignment: Complements BIO’s mission as an incubator of translational science while ensuring funding models are sustainable.
• Relationship Development: Establishes a first good-faith collaboration with Wolfram Institute, opening future opportunities.

---

Scientific Scope and Deliverables

Focus: Mechanism design and computational modeling to determine optimal incentive structures for DAO-based basic science funding.

Methods

• Literature Review: Academic and DeSci “grey literature.”
• Expert Interviews: Founders, science policy experts, legal specialists, researchers, entrepreneurs, and technical experts.
• Participatory Observation: Active involvement in DAO communities and forums.
• Practical Experimentation: Minimal “toy” DAO to explore technical/legal requirements.
• Qualitative Thematic Analysis: Identify patterns across interviews, observations, and sources.
• Community Engagement: Regular office hours for collaborative feedback.

Deliverables

1. Peer-reviewed whitepaper on DeSci DAOs and their role in funding basic science.
2. Literature review-style resource collection on best technical/legal practices for DeSci DAOs in the US.
3. Eight blog articles and presentations (two per month for first four months).
4. Weekly community office hours (2 hours bi-weekly) for engagement and feedback.

---

Budget

• Total Request: $20,000 USD equivalent in $RSC
• Recipient: Wolfram Institute-managed research fund
• Structure: One-time treasury contribution; no IP or equity claims

---

Strategic Impact for BIO

• Governance Incubator: Positions BIO as a leader in incentive-alignment frameworks, validated by Wolfram Institute.
• Ecosystem Synergy: Reinforces collaborations with VitaDAO, PsyDAO, and future BioDAOs.
• Dealflow Quality: Improves long-term project selection via better-aligned funding mechanisms.
• Visibility: Associates BIO with cutting-edge governance research, boosting credibility among researchers, token holders, and funders.

---

📌 Recommendation

Approve $20,000 from BIO treasury to fund the Wolfram Institute’s study:
How can DeSci DAOs better align incentives for funding basic science research?