Tokenomic Issues

I propose to increase the APR of staking and liquidity providing to reward the active users of Pancakeswap.

With low APRs (and getting lower due to votes) we are not incentivising people to use Pancakeswap directly, if CAKE has little to no emmisions at all why use Pancakeswap? Just hold your CAKE in an exchange, much easier.

I don't think people fully understand the effect of emissions, think of emissions as a company giving stock dividends instead of cash, let's say 4% stock dividend, nothing happens at all, because everybody gets 4% (This is not the case for Pancakeswap since we have burns).

However not all CAKE holders get the best returns. Let's go back to the dividend example, some people get the 4%, some don't, in this scenario the 4% return guy actually gets something because he gets more compared to others. This is a good way to reward people who actually use Pancakeswap.

If CAKE emmisions go to zero, there will be no more staking and rewards for providing liquidity is very low. What do you think will happen to Pancakeswap if that occurs?

Here's another one, people just get excited over high APRs even if it's pure inflation. (to reiterate CAKE is not purely inflationary due to burns).

From what I see most people want CAKE to be deflationary, which is great, but not the best option. If what you want is to get the maximum amount of value, increasing emissions is the best option. If you're reading this you're one of the people going to benefit from higher emissions.

I'm not proposing to increase the emissions to max immediately, there are people who want the exact opposite of what I'm proposing after all.

Deflation can still be achieved, what we need to do is focus on deflationary products, instead of trying to force it through lower emissions.

We get more burns if more people use the platform, increasing emissions will get us more users.

Thank you for reading, let's continue to make this a great community.