Where Should Our Tech Stack Expand Next?

Summary As we continue building on MODE, we’re evaluating new blockchain ecosystems for the next phase of our interconnected DeFi stack. Charged Particles, Web3 Packs, and Packy work together to create a seamless DeFi experience, combining programmable liquidity, bundled token exposure, and autonomous optimization.

Charged Particles provides the foundational technology, allowing NFTs to hold and manage digital assets. Web3 Packs builds on this, offering curated, one-click DeFi portfolios for seamless user access. Packy automates portfolio management and reward optimization through AI-driven execution.

By expanding to a new blockchain, we can extend this ecosystem to more users, unlocking greater liquidity, enhanced DeFi accessibility, and optimized yield strategies. We want your input on which blockchain Packy should expand to next!

Why Expansion? Expanding to a new chain means greater accessibility, deeper liquidity, and enhanced automation across multiple ecosystems. This move would:

• Increase adoption of Packy’s AI-driven DeFi strategies.
• Tap into new liquidity pools for optimized yield opportunities.
• Enhance cross-chain DeFi functionality, allowing users on different networks to interact with Packy.
• Bring Web3 Packs and Charged Particles tech to new users, expanding access to one-click DeFi portfolios and yield-generating NFTs.

Expansion Options The community has voiced strong opinions on three major blockchain candidates for our tech stacks next expansion:

Option 1: Ink Pros: Innovative smart contract capabilities, growing community, backed by Kraken. Their product lead is bullish on us already, they want to grow with us. Cons: Less DeFi liquidity compared to major chains, newer chain. Potential Impact: A great testing ground for customizable Pack automation, leveraging Programmable Liquidity NFTs, and to be able to grow alongside an up-and-coming chain with a lot of momentum and support.

Option 2: Base Pros: Strong developer community, deep liquidity, backed by Coinbase, bigger audience share. Cons: Newer ecosystem, still growing DeFi integrations, harder to get team support. Potential Impact: Web3 Packs could tap into Base’s growing retail user base, introducing AI-optimized DeFi packs powered by Charged Particles.

Option 3: BSC Pros: Large DeFi user base, low transaction fees, and fast finality. Cons: Higher risk of lower-quality projects in the ecosystem. Potential Impact: Mass adoption potential, leveraging BSC’s high DeFi activity to introduce Packy’s AI-driven automation for Web3 Packs.