Hello Conkers 1.0, following the launch of conk 2.0 and the community involvement around this new launch, it's pretty clear that the original conk is put aside and will be left inactive. New members entering the conklave has not been caring too much apparently, just having a look at treasury address (0x9b2A62371C530fd357B9d59DeC1622599A4a1BBB ) it appear clear that something more could be done. New conklave members are losing around 50% of their treasury value due to usdc depeg and not acting to prevent the treasury to lose more (walletconnect v2 is working correctly with beets.fi for example, so action to swap could be taken easily). For this inactive behavior, treasury lost around 500$ and moreover it could be earning something by putting at work the little asset still available to use. Not mentioning obviously the veNft and the equal kept in spot without any intervention. Moreover, all the new participant like Phyilcrypto and ZorgBlatt has been posting on social everything but Conk 1.0 and their new plans/ideas for reviving it, moreover interacting with the new conk 2.0 posing a problem of conflict of interest . If this proposal to pass, those "new" members has to resign from their position and get some trusted person to take over and care about basic operations. All the conkers can agree that conk is suffering the rave mess, but some action to keep it alive needs to be taken. If this proposal to pass, trusted people as mr Hickstick and mr Pocong (the creator of conk) need to take further actions and ensure this proposal to be effective while transitioning to a new active conklave composition. This proposal will last 3 days since the start. Long live Conk 1.0