Whether the AssangeDao community completes all-round self-governance

Long-term negative treatment of the community by the AssangeDao's project side. The user rights and interests of the community have been greatly damaged. The AssangeDao community should not be a place full of cold violence and dictatorship. This is in great conflict with the personal qualities of the spiritual leader Assange Julian we are about to rescue. Likewise, we are highly skeptical of the existing AssangeDao project parties. Through Vitalik Buterin's view of Assangedao, justice should expand its broad definition to achieve a truly impartial and community-led dao organization. Based on this, I hope that community token holders will vote on some of the current issues in the community.

A: Wait for the project party's processing result of community governance.

B:Re-map the new justice contract according to the existing currency holdings and complete the audit and give up ownership, but the governance goal is limited to rescue Assange.

C: Re-map the new justice contract with 1% transaction tax according to the existing holdings and complete the audit and give up ownership. But the goal of governance is not limited to saving assange, but also includes maintaining justice projects proposed by the community (including but not limited to rights protection projects such as legal proceedings against existing Assangedao project parties). 1% of the contract tax will enter the treasury and be fully governed by the community, which will elect new treasury multi-signers such as AMIR, Vitalik Buterin, etc.