Re-Submission: Eliminate Leaderboard and Wearable Rewards — With Conditional Restoration Tied to Profitability

Background

The first vote to remove leaderboard and wearable rewards failed.
New financial data shows the cuts are now essential:

Week	Net Revenue	Leaderboard + Wearables
4/14 – 4/20	+ €1.40 K	€4.00 K
4/21 – 4/27	+ €0.02 K	€4.26 K
4/28 – 5/04	– €4.81 K	€4.48 K
3-Week Total	– €3.39 K	€12.74 K

We lost money while paying €12.7 K to users who mostly hold no $BAG or create lasting value.
Rewards now drain ≈ €4.3 K per week (~€17 K/month)—about one-fifth of our monthly burn.

Redirecting that cash to paid acquisition with a 2.5 × ROAS could flip the business to break-even.

Proposal

1. Immediate Action

• Eliminate all leaderboard and wearable rewards right away, saving ≈ €17 K/month.
• Do not reallocate these funds yet; the goal is pure burn reduction.

2. Conditional Restoration

• When BAG.WIN records €100 K in monthly net profit (not revenue), wearable rewards resume at 100 % of former levels.
• For each additional €100 K in net profit, rewards rise +30 %, capped at 300 %.
• Profit figures reviewed monthly; payouts scale automatically with performance.

---

Rationale

• Data-driven: €12.74 K in rewards erased all gains and pushed operations €3.39 K into the red.
• Capital efficiency: Cash now subsidising zero-stake users can fund growth channels with measurable ROI.
• Alignment: Rewards return only when the platform can clearly afford them.
• Treasury protection: Cutting this 17 %–20 % drag immediately extends runway and lowers break-even.

Summary

• Cuts ≈ €17 K/month of unproductive spend.
• Extends runway and reduces burn.
• Sets a fair, automatic path for rewards to return once the business is firmly profitable.
• Re-aligns spending with common-sense, business-first discipline.

Vote FOR to protect the treasury now and reward everyone later, when it’s sustainable.
Vote AGAINST to keep paying extractive rewards that push the DAO further into deficit.