Expand DESK EDU with curated user submissions

Proposal: DESK EDU, the collection of tutorials and instructional articles available from the DESK Hub, should be expanded with curated user submissions.

tl;dr: Giving users a say in DESK EDU may seem mundane and unimportant, but it will help to quickly create efficient, reliable, and effective resources if a major problem ever arises with the $DESK ecosystem.

Rationale: Allowing users to contribute to DESK EDU will benefit $DESK users in many ways. The unique points of view contributed by users occupying different roles in the $DESK ecosystem will help the articles in DESK EDU be of assistance to a greater portion of the $DESK community. Having users in the loop will also increase the capacity and ability of DESK EDU to release new articles. This will allow DESK EDU to more quickly respond to sudden problems affecting a large portion of users, such as an outage of an essential service. In addition, it will also provide CoinDesk staff leeway to contribute to the core website without having to continually revise DESK EDU as new problems arise.

Screening Process: New DESK EDU articles could be submitted though a Discord channel or a form within the DESK hub. Submitted articles would have to be approved by a member of the CoinDesk staff or Discord administrator. If the volume of article submissions became too high for DESK EDU administrators to personally screen, a community voting process could be installed in which the community would vote on new DESK EDU submissions, and the DESK EDU administrators would review the top submissions. Such a system could be implemented by using a service such as snapshot.org.