• © Goverland Inc. 2026
  • v1.0.8
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
Donut DAODonut DAOby0xbE8793cE3eA65A70BdA8C0364981f900Ad80d9dB0xbE87…d9dB

[Governance Poll Proposal] Migrate DONUTs from Gnosis to Arbitrum One

Voting ended over 2 years agoFailed

This proposal post is for discussion concerning the migration of DONUTs to a different chain than Gnosis, namely Arbitrum One.

#The problem

During the 2021 bull market gas fees became prohibitively expensive for DONUT-related activity, so a transition to Gnosis was made. At the time, no real L2, as we know them now, was available. While there was some possibility Gnosis would become an L2, this has now explicitly been ruled out.

#The solution

As an Ethereum community, the Mod Team suggests to move to an appropriate Ethereum-secured L2: Arbitrum One.

#FAQ

Why not Arbitrum Nova?

There's no multisig available there.

Why not Polygon?

Because we'd prefer to remain within the Ethereum network.

Additional comment by carlslarson:

For some reference, gas price for a tip on Arbitrum One would right now be around 1.2c (vs .08c on gnosis). A full, subsidized distribution (where we pay for all sends) would be ~6$ (vs 5c on gnosis). I would assume Nova is much cheaper, closer to Gnosis. But this cost may come down substantially post-EIP 4844. And it also comes with advantage of a wider and much more supported ecosystem as well as being a full fledged and secure

Ethereum L2. If cheaper tx are needed for some activity it might be possible to shift only that activity to Nova (a future on-chain upvote system, for instance).

Off-Chain Vote

For
1.79M DONUT95.5%
Against
73.57K DONUT3.9%
Abstain
11.75K DONUT0.6%
Quorum:42%
Download mobile app to vote

Discussion

Donut DAO[Governance Poll Proposal] Migrate DONUTs from Gnosis to Arbitrum One

Timeline

Dec 15, 2023Proposal created
Dec 15, 2023Proposal vote started
Dec 18, 2023Proposal vote ended
Dec 18, 2023Proposal updated