• © Goverland Inc. 2026
  • v1.0.3
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
Donut DAODonut DAOby0x0c4B8B79E0ebA3e407Bc175176Db496474046e9a0x0c4B…6e9a

Lower AI threshold for link submissions

Voting ended 7 months agoSucceeded

Current situation

Right now, text submissions with ≥25% AI generated content are removed, while link posts are only removed if they're ≥75% AI generated.


Problem

Despite multiple "nerfs" on the link flair, link spam is still an issue on r/EthTrader.

Low effort / low quality articles, usually (partially) AI written, clog the feed with recycled headlines like:

  • "ETH sits at $2,500, will ETH climb to $4,000 next week?"
  • "ETH experiences significant inflows"
  • "SHIB forms double bottom as whales accumulate"
  • "PEPE price expects a pullback"

When they are scanned by the mod team, these articles usually score between 20 to 50% AI, so they can't be removed even though they add no real value.


Solution

I suggest lowering the removal threshold for link submissions to ≥25%, if they are AI generated, matching the rule for text posts and thus having a single "no AI generated content" rule.

This makes moderation simpler and holds all types of content to the same standard.


Advantages

  • Encourages quality over quantity.
  • Reduces spam from link farmers.
  • Supports users who actually read and engage with the content they're posting.
  • Increases content quality and standards.

Disadvantages

  • Some borderline posts might end up being removed, but if the content is over 25% AI how valuable can it really be?

Conclusion

Through this ETIP, r/EthTrader stops rewarding and incentivizing noise. This ETIP is about having a cleaner feed and supporting thoughtful contributions.

If we want r/EthTrader to grow in value and reputation, this is the next right step.

Off-Chain Vote

For
5.28M DONUT41%
Against
0 DONUT0%
Abstain
7.61M DONUT59%
Quorum:287%
Download mobile app to vote

Discussion

Donut DAOLower AI threshold for link submissions

Timeline

Jul 01, 2025Proposal created
Jul 01, 2025Proposal vote started
Jul 06, 2025Proposal vote ended
Jul 06, 2025Proposal updated