The idea is to keep optimal borrow rates at optimal level, so borrowers can make some %. It doesn’t mean they have to make 50% profits with a simple strategy (they can though, if they add market directional positions to a farm like here. This exercise makes less sense when there are 100 strategies, but now it’s pretty clear what & how can make money aka be usable. So we can and should fix. Everyone is free to use however they want, we are just looking at the most obvious opportunities.
Let’s start with the optimal rates. They were set up with the utilization parameters to reflect whatever currently can be sourced across the available positions and strategies.
We estimate that at optimal 80% utilization - the borrowing costs are approximately:
These are the back of the envelope estimations we did for what the borrowing cost for Credit Accounts would be at 80% utilization given current Gearbox V2 parameters.
So what? Well the GEAR incentives for wstETH pool are currently a waste. It’s too much of an “expensive debt asset”. It can allow for stETH shorting essentially, but the market for that does not seem to be huge right now anyway, is it? So my motion is to remove all incentives for wstETH pool (but keep the pool itself, no need to remove) and redirect the same supply incentives to the other pools.
There is more potential for borrowers to realize on stables & ETH, so let’s give them that!
Vanilla TVL without any sign of utilization is a useless expenditure. With this move, we increase the chances of utilization on product debt assets, while minimizing for TVL drops. The 7.5K wstETH [8.2K ETH] currently being there represents $13M of TVL. But that number is useless if it just gets brrr and contributes nothing. I believe some of those LPs can do switch to ETH pool, some might decide to stick around to see utilization grow, and some will leave. That is fine, the rebalances are natural!
This should prompt 1% withdrawal fee removal immediately for this pool specifically, so LPs can take decisions at the same time. Would be unethical to remove and keep the fee. Already voted for!
WBTC is a different asset, and can still yield interesting short-long positions. Keep it for now. But reduce the spending on it and move it onto W(ETH) and USDC pools 50-50% split
This should prompt 1% withdrawal fee removal immediately for this pool specifically, so LPs can take decisions at the same time. Would be unethical to remove and keep the fee. Already voted for!
That will make FRAX pool have 0.168% incentives and could incentivize scaling AMO to $10M!
So the changes would look as follows: