• © Goverland Inc. 2026
  • v1.0.5
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
Harvest FinanceHarvest Financeby0x252E7E8B9863f81798B1fEF8CfD9741A46De653C0x252E…653C

Balancer Emission Poll

Voting ended over 5 years agoFailed

👨‍🌾 Calling all farmers, should we further incentivize the 80/20 FARM pool, or should we spray the emissions to incentivize AUM instead?

There are two representative opinions on the path forward on how to graze our fertile pastures:

Option 🍏: As the farm continues to gain in prosperity, the balancer pool is proving to become less relevant over time. 89.8% of the volume occurs on Uniswap, versus 8.49% on Balancer. The protocol uses Uniswap for FARM buybacks because the slippage is much less. 🍏 farmers believe that it's in the protocol's interest to move the emissions to incentivize AUM, and generate more profit sharing for FARM.

Option 🍊: We want to diversify our sources of liquidity, and balancer is the second largest exchange, which allows for flexible splits. Not all farmers can take IL on a 50/50 pool, and some people prefer the 80/20 because it is less risk. 🍊 farmers believe that it's in the protocol's interest to keep it, as a way to distribute FARM to this type of liquidity provider. These LPs also get BAL rewards.

Vote 🍏 to move emissions to front page deposits. Vote 🍊 to keep balancer pool.

Off-Chain Vote

🍏 move balancer emissions to front page deposits
0 0%
🍊keep balancer emissions
0 0%
Download mobile app to vote

Timeline

Sep 13, 2020Proposal created
Sep 13, 2020Proposal vote started
Sep 14, 2020Proposal vote ended
Jan 23, 2024Proposal updated