The following is an extract of the proposal posted on the Idle governance forum.
Treasury League
A proposal to discuss the next steps of the $IDLE incentivization, aka the Liquidity Mining program, on Best Yield strategies ending in April 2023.
The Liquidity Mining program is live since November 2020 with different rates of IDLE distribution. During this period, the IDLE incentives were also routed to Yield Tranches through the Gauges system. A summary follows:
To understand the financial performance of the incentives program, it can be useful to understand the dollar cost, aka the acquisition cost, of the fees generated by the Idle strategies for every $IDLE incentive distributed.
How many fees were generated by the Idle strategies vs the $ amount of IDLE distributed?
We have already analysed two different distribution periods:
Today we will add a third part
Distribution 3 The Best Yield strategy received around 21k $IDLE incentives, i.e. 47% of the funds, (for an average dollar value of $9k with IDLE price equal to $0.42) and generated around $22k in fees for the DAO.
These results seem to suggest that the incentivization program for Best Yield is strategic and helped retain the TVL. We should anyway weigh this analysis taking into consideration its short length. Due to the Euler exploit that happened on March 13th, multiple strategies were paused. Hence the analysis lasts only ~40 days.
We will list three ideas as the next steps for the Liquidity Mining program:
The Best Yield strategy has been incentivised through the Liquidity Mining program with different distribution rates (3205 → 2215 → 1000 → 500 IDLE/Day). One option is to extend for another 3 month the program at the same distribution rate.
The IDLE needed to fund this extension can be taken from the Ecosystem fund.
Extending the incentivization length of the LM program can be strategically smart to retain the current liquidity (mainly sitting in the DAI, USDC and USDT BY markets). Even more, now that the Best Yield and the Yield Tranches strategies can work synergetically.
This emission rate would not affect the rewards return for the BY strategy (+0.2% at current prices).
Another option is to extend for another 3 months program but adjust its distribution rate.
The IDLE needed to fund this extension can be taken from the Ecosystem fund.
This emission rate would affect minimally the rewards return for the BY strategy (+0.1% at current prices).
One last option is to pause the Liquidity Mining program.
From a DAO treasury perspective, this option would stop the emission of IDLE and reduce significantly the selling pressure on the DAO governance token. The emission rate would affect the rewards return for the BY strategy and stakers.
It is important to remember that the Liquidity Mining program started in November 2020 with different rates of distributions and strategies affected.
The DAO may also think to update the Integration Partners program and create an ad-hoc solution for integrators that count on the additional return given by IDLE on the Idle strategies.