Should the DAO add 9birdy9 to the payouts with $1000 per cycle?

In terms of funding cycles this proposal adds 9birdy9 to the payouts for the cycle with a paymnet of $1000.

Follows the full text of the proposal, as made by 9birdy9, discussed in the discord, approved in the temperature check and refined in the notion doc:

Original post: https://discord.com/channels/775859454780244028/873248745771372584/887530393090293831 Temp Check: https://discord.com/channels/775859454780244028/873248745771372584/888178972637151263 Notion text below:

Who:

@9birdy9

0x6691aF446Bb121b19aec9c0FF6ed9c4721D5fee1

Proposal date:

September 14, 2021

What role have you played in the community and what have you contributed thus far?

Over the last few weeks, I have contributed to the community in governance and onboarding. Specifically, I have completed and presented research on governance, created accessibility for governance information on docs, and created docs for the onboarding process.

What role do you plan on playing in the community going forward?

Going forward, I would like to take the lead on the governance project.

How much do you want to earn? What else do you foresee needing from the community for you to do your best work?

I would like to earn $500 weekly. In order to do my best work, I need active participation from the community on governance issues as well as honest feedback from community members about how they feel I am doing in my role.

What does success look like for someone taking on your role?

In my book, the tasks of the lead governance position can be broken down into three parts. First is facilitation. In order to create an authentic decentralized form of governance, there needs to be constant conversation and speculation of which the lead governance position can facilitate. The second part, is research. In order for a community to make an accurate decision, they need to be well informed of different governance options and to be presented with stimulating ideas. The final task is just general accessibility to governance information by keeping the community updated on what we have done so far (docs etc).

Under what criteria might it make sense for the community to reassess this payout allocation to you?

The community should reassess payments to me if progress towards a decentralized form of governance is lost and if there is a lack of circulation of governance ideas focused on community betterment.