Context: Please refer to Original Full-Time Team Proposal
Key Terms:
- Dynamic Compensation: Lower Base Pay + Unlimited Upside Potential
- Static Compensation: Base Pay + No additional comp above this
Why?
Dynamic compensation was intended to incentivize full-time contributors to earn above their base wage; however, this now feels (1) like a distraction from work and (2) bad incentive alignment.
I’d prefer to be in a compensation model where I can just focus on results without having to worry about asking the DAO for additional comp.
Reminder: Basic Full-time Conditions
- Community can vote out a full time contributor at any point.
- Ends in 4 months and must reapply.
- Must hold 100% of existing $KRAUSE balance to receive pay.
Change
Original: 10k $KRAUSE with unlimited upside through additional proposals.
Fixed: 10k $KRAUSE + 6667 USDC fixed.
Transparency
For transparency’s sake, here’s what I’ve been up to since the initial proposal passed. This is not meant to be comprehensive, but rather a few highlights:
- Building Krause House wallet / dashboard with the initial features of a (1) token weighted forum to discuss Snapshot votes and (2) a place to create petitions for specific people or teams to sign off on. I see this more generally as turning into a home where Jerry’s can (1) perform a number of voting functions, (2) interact with KH smart contracts for commitment staking or token lockups for multipliers, (3) so many possibilities, the design space here is huge.
- Created Open Bounty Board + Discord Bot to help contributors and newcomers understand where they can provide value.
- Built Snapshot Discord Bot to keep voters up to date from within the Discord.
- Built Proposals Database Bot to pipe open proposals data into Discord (took offline, not sure if it’s useful).
- Proposal reviews, working with contributors to edit/improve proposals, managing Snapshot, and working to improve ease of proposals. This includes experimenting with improved UX, including creating forms to help simplify the process and TL;DR versions of how governance works—more to come.
- Working 1-on-1 with contributors to help them take leadership and initiate teams.
- Generally, and most importantly, whatever is needed / general gardening of the DAO. Recruiting new talent, managing Discord, troubleshooting, fixing issues as they arise.
WAGBAT