Create New Badges and Make Visible for Public

Should the problem/opportunity outlined be refined and taken to the next level?

PROBLEM STATEMENT Problem 1: Currently, there is a lack of transparency for DAO voters on grantees with previous revoked grants.

Some grantees of revoked grants do deserve a second chance. However, that is why we can have badges on their name. This will give them a chance to share what happened or how they made a mistake in the past or whatever. Things happen.

The point of this is to make sure that DAO voters at least have the knowledge of the history of the grantee they are voting for.

Problem 2: We have a lot of Decentraland DAO voters who have voted in favor of grants that have been revoked.

When a DAO voter has a previous history of voting for revoked grants, they should be recognized by other DAO members. They may still be credible, but it should be next to their name when they make comments that they have a record of voting for grants that are being revoked.

The point of this is to make sure that DAO voters at least have the knowledge of the history of other DAO voters who are commenting on the forum.

PROPOSED SOLUTION Solution 1: Show a Badge next to the Grantee's name when a proposal is being made by them or if they are tagged in the proposal itself. The new badges should be:

"Previously Revoked Grant" "Previously Revoked Grant with Completed Successful Grant" "Prevously Revoked Grant with Return Payment" Solution 2: Show a Badge next to a DAO voter's name when they comment on in the Decentraland Forum or if they are tagged in the proposal itself, or are proposing the proposal. The new badges should be:

"Voted for 5 or more Revoked Grants" "Voted for 10 or more Revoked Grants" "Voted for 10 or more Successfully Completed Grants" "Voted for 25 or more Successfully Completed Grants" *Remember this is no fault of the voters, but it helps show their previous credibility of their judgment.

TARGET AUDIENCE/CUSTOMER BASE DAO Voters and Grantees

WHY IS THIS RELEVANT NOW? Credibility is completely relevant for future grants and this credibility system will keep check on the grantees and voters.

Of course anyone can make a new profile or new wallet, but reputation is usually looked at when a grant is being proposed. It makes it more difficult for people to be able to get a grant that shouldn't get it and it helps hold voters accountable.

About the bidding and tendering process NEW 1 Validate by pitching Relevant topics may spawn initiatives eligible for being funded by the DAO

VOTING ENDS IN 5 DAYS

2 Narrow down to Tender Refine into a clearer scope so that teams may propose specific projects

REQUIRES PITCH TO PASS

3 Open for Bids Teams submit projects they think would match the Tender

REQUIRES TENDER TO PASS

4 Project assignation Funding allocated to the proposal accumulating the most VP

TBD