Centralized vs Decentralized Growth Strategy Vote

1. Executive Summary

The $LBM token has received an Assessment Zone notice from MEXC. While certain listing metrics are compliant, others require sustained improvement to maintain the listing.

This proposal seeks a formal community decision on whether:

• $LBM should remain listed on MEXC and allocate resources to meeting the required metrics

or

• $LBM should voluntarily delist and focus exclusively on decentralised exchange growth.

The outcome of this vote will determine the platform’s exchange strategy moving forward.

2. Background

MEXC Assessment Requirements

MEXC has identified the following metrics for continued listing:

1. ✅ Organic holder count — currently compliant
2. ⚠ Holding value metric — requires improvement
3. ⚠ Organic daily trading volume — must exceed 5,000 USDT
4. ⚠ Active liquidity within ±2% price range — must exceed 1,000 USDT combined buy/sell depth

Current Status

• Liquidity within the ±2% zone has been adjusted and now consistently exceeds the 1,000 USDT requirement.
• Organic daily trading volume remains below the 5,000 USDT threshold.
• To satisfy the holding value metric, approximately 25,000 USD worth of LBM would need to be distributed across multiple independent MEXC accounts (non-whitelisted and not market-maker linked).

3. Strategic Options

Option A — Maintain MEXC Listing

To remain listed, the ecosystem would need to:

• Sustain daily organic trading volume above 5,000 USDT
• Maintain consistent liquidity depth within ±2%
• Support distributed deposits to satisfy holding value metrics

Potential Benefits

• Continued centralized exchange visibility
• Broader exchange presence
• Access for CEX-native traders

Risks & Trade-Offs

• Ongoing pressure to meet centralized performance metrics
• Exposure to market maker structures and associated fees
• Arbitrage pressure between CEX and DEX
• Capital efficiency constraints

Option B — Voluntary Delisting

Under this approach, $LBM would:

• Concentrate liquidity on Uniswap and B-DEX
• Remove centralized exchange listing obligations
• Rely on decentralised price discovery mechanisms

Potential Benefits

• Alignment with decentralised strategy
• Reduced dependency on centralized exchange metrics
• Improved capital efficiency
• Greater control over liquidity strategy

Risks & Trade-Offs

• Loss of centralized exchange exposure
• Reduced access for CEX-only traders
• Possible short-term perception impact

4. Proposal

The $LBM DAO is requested to vote on the following motion:

Should $LBM voluntarily request delisting from MEXC and focus exclusively on decentralised exchange growth?

5. Voting Options

✅ YES — Proceed with voluntary delisting from MEXC

❌ NO — Remain listed and work toward meeting MEXC requirements

⚪ ABSTAIN — No position

6. Implementation

If the proposal passes:

• A formal delisting request will be submitted to MEXC.
• Liquidity strategy will be consolidated on Uniswap and B-DEX.
• A follow-up DAO update will outline the decentralised liquidity roadmap.

If the proposal fails:

• A strategy plan will be published detailing how required metrics will be achieved and sustained.