• © Goverland Inc. 2026
  • v1.0.3
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
LidoLidoby0x32254b28F793CC18B3575C86c61fE3D7421cbbef0x3225…bbef

Proposed Spend on Contributed 'LeXpunK Builder Defense DAO' Funds

Voting ended over 4 years agoSucceeded

The following is a vote on the proposed allocation of LeXpunK Builder Defense DAO funds as outlined in the following proposal.


Proposed Spend on Contributed Funds - Tranche 1 (start of Q4 2021 - end of Q1-2022)

  1. Operations | $150k (fund coordinator pay ($3k per project) & misc. expenses)
  2. DAO Structure & Risk Mitigation Bounties:
  • Build DAO Coop / Labor Union Model | $15k min, up to $150k
  • Model Foundation / DAO back-to-back docs / structure | $15k min, up to $100k
  • Limited liability for DAOs, forking California nonprofit unincorporated association statute | $20k min, up to $100k
  • DAO tax safe harbor (cross-category) - proposal to establish a safe harbor for smart contract systems that if they pay a ‘greater of’ %-based or flat tax, they will fit into safe harbor for certain tax-related risks
  • Guidance paper regarding DAO legal claim standing, attorney client privilege issues, and proposed model structures and parameters for proper DAO legal defense funding | $25k min, up to $60k

Model Legislation/Regulation Bounties

  1. Section 409A amendment to improve tax treatment of vesting token awards + fork of yearn vesting contract that complements the amendment proposal | $25k min, up to $50k (legal) ; $50k flat (smart contract)
  2. Fork of Hester Peirce Safe Harbor (address lack of smart contract coverage & other issues) | $20k min, up to $100k
  3. Amendments to Beyer Crypto Bill (carve-out algo stablecoins, improve desecuritization process, better - clarity on not covering DeFi) | $10k min, up to $50k
  4. DAO tax safe harbor (cross-category) - proposal to establish a safe harbor for smart contract systems (i.e., if pay a “greater of” %-based or flat tax, a safe harbor for certain tax-related risks will apply).

Policy/Legal Position Paper Bounties

  1. Position paper on why DeFi smart contract transactions do not meet definitions of ‘swap’ | $50k min, up to $200k
  2. Why Worker-Driven DeFi communities are different from VC-backed communities and legal ramifications | $10k
  3. DeFi Functional Overview (functional overview, review against risk frameworks, discuss implications/application of CEA) | $50k
  4. Position paper on the MiCA Commission’s proposal, its potential application to DeFi protocols and basis for why its application should be limited in scope and recommendations / modifications of the existent rules to cover risks posed | $30k min, up to $40k
  5. Workable AML/KYC Compliance Model - compliance for regulated entities at fiat on and off-ramps | $15k

Off-Chain Vote

For
50.77M 100%
Against
0 0%
Download mobile app to vote

Timeline

Sep 22, 2021Proposal created
Sep 22, 2021Proposal vote started
Sep 29, 2021Proposal vote ended
Oct 26, 2023Proposal updated