This proposal advances Metis' next phase of ecosystem alignment - strengthening the bridge across all network layers (Andromeda, Hyperion, LazAI, ZKM, GOAT) through refined token flows and unified incentives that reward real usage. It formalizes two interlinked upgrades:
Optimizing DSeq sustainability (20% → 15%) and establishing the Ecosystem Alignment & Growth Reserve (EAGR) to power validator expansion, liquidity depth, and cross-layer participation - without new issuance or inflation.
Since ReGenesis, Metis has operated on a consistent architectural principle: fortify the base infrastructure first, enable high-performance applications, and ensure that generated value flows back to the ecosystem. As outlined in Elena's recent letter to the community (https://www.metis.io/blog/metis-september-monthly-roundup-hyperion-builders-make-history), our architecture includes:
Andromeda: Traditional EVM-compatible Layer 2 handling general settlement and foundational applications, including DeFi
Hyperion: Performance expansion layer providing elasticity for high-throughput, low-latency scenarios, including AI workloads
LazAI: Application and data layer converting AI × DAT scenarios into on-chain visible records that connect user actions with assetization paths
ZKM: Zero-knowledge and verifiable compute infrastructure as long-term primitives
GOAT: Bitcoin Layer 2 exploration derived from ZKM, philosophically aligned with Metis in turning verifiable compute and real usage into network value
These components represent different facets of a unified ecosystem in which network value returns to the Metis ecosystem through usage-driven, on-chain-visible mechanisms.
The blockchain industry has seen major shifts lately. Market volatility has tested Layer 2 ecosystems, while AI's rise has created new opportunities and pressures for infrastructure builders. Communities have voiced concerns about sustainability, resource efficiency, and the need for adaptive strategies that stay true to core principles.
Metis' approach focuses on strategic alignment rather than reactive change, bringing the other network layers into closer alignment. Its integration of AI through LazAI and verifiable compute via ZKM reflects a long-term vision of usage-driven value creation—not short-term trend chasing. To realize this, Metis is refining its economic model to balance immediate incentives with long-term sustainability as it launches new network phases requiring validator and liquidity support.
A key component of ecosystem unification is establishing METIS as the native gas token for the LazAI network. This represents the first step in unifying the ecosystem, creating direct, usage-driven demand in which every AI inference, data operation, and on-chain computation requires METIS. The EAGR will provide initial gas liquidity support and mechanisms to ensure a seamless user experience during network launch.
The two interconnected optimizations proposed below enable this ecosystem unification while maintaining long-term sustainability:
Current Parameter: 20% annualized mining rewards rate
Proposed Parameter: 15% annualized mining rewards rate
Rationale:
The Decentralized Sequencer pool has matured since launch, with established participation and operational stability
At 15%, Metis sequencer yields remain above leading L2 averages (e.g., Base, Arbitrum validator returns <10%), ensuring continued attractiveness while improving economic runway by 25%.
Optimizing the rate frees capital for broader ecosystem expansion and aligns incentives across upcoming network layers.
Implementation:
Smooth phased rollout to ensure continuity
Parameters and timeline will be determined to minimize disruption and adjusted as needed
Existing sequencer operations remain unaffected during the transition period
Size: 20% of total METIS supply (reallocated from existing Mining Rewards).
Source: Reallocation within the original tokenomics "Mining Rewards" toward growth
Critical Clarifications:
No new token issuance: EAGR represents a reallocation toward growth of already-allocated tokens
No change to total supply cap: The maximum METIS supply remains unchanged
Phased release model: Tokens convert to circulating supply gradually per specific use case activation
Community & Stakeholder Participation Paths & EAGR Example Use Cases (Whitelist-Based Execution):
Validator Staking for New Network Phases
Ecosystem Liquidity Support
Treasury Support for Ecosystem Sub-Projects
Governance and Execution:
Phased release per use-case activation
Whitelist-based allocation requiring documented usage justification
Implementation aligned with established governance procedures
Economic Impact Analysis:
Total supply: 10,000,000 METIS → 10,000,000 METIS (No change)
Circulating Supply: Dynamic → Dynamic (Phased per use case)
Demand-side offsets: Staking, locking, and real usage requirements create natural demand mechanisms
Inflation: None
For METIS Holders:
Improved long-term economic sustainability through balanced reward structures
Enhanced ecosystem growth potential through strategic capital allocation
Transparent resource management with clear accountability mechanisms
For Decentralized Sequencers:
Continued competitive rewards at a 15% annualized rate
Smooth transition preventing operational disruption
Strengthened overall ecosystem supporting sequencer value proposition
For Ecosystem Builders:
Access to strategic support through EAGR mechanisms for qualified projects
Validator participation opportunities in emerging network phases
Aligned incentive structures promoting long-term ecosystem contribution
For the Broader Community:
Visible commitment to sustainable growth over short-term extraction
Infrastructure support for next-generation applications (AI, DAT, cross-chain)
Model resilience during market volatility
Phase 1 (Upon Approval): Governance vote completion and result announcement
Phase 2 (Within 2 weeks of approval):
Detailed technical implementation notice for DSeq rate transition
EAGR establishment
Phase 3 (Within 4 weeks of approval):
Phase 4 (Ongoing):
Validator participation program details release
Community feedback integration
Adaptive parameter adjustments through governance as needed
Proposal Type: Governance Proposal (modifies economic model parameters and tokenomics structure)
Voting Platform: Snapshot (https://snapshot.org/#/metislayer2.eth)
Voting Timeline:
Monday, October 27: Proposal publication on governance forum, accompanying blog post announcement, and Snapshot vote initiation
Wednesday, October 29: Snapshot vote initiation
Thursday, October 30: Community Twitter Space for questions and clarifications
Monday, November 3: Vote conclusion (5-day voting period)
Voting Options:
Approve (support both DSeq rate optimization and EAGR establishment)
Reject (oppose the proposed changes)
Abstain
Quorum Requirements: Per the governance framework for Governance Proposals
Implementation Authority: Upon majority approval, the Metis Foundation will coordinate execution under guidance from community governance and validator feedback according to established governance procedures, with Governance Working Group oversight.
Metis Foundation Governance Framework: https://www.metis.foundation/governance
Metis Developer Documentation: https://docs.metis.io
Decentralized Sequencer Overview: https://docs.metis.io/dev/decentralized-sequencer/overview
CEG Governance Forum: https://forum.ceg.vote
Snapshot Voting Platform: https://snapshot.org/#/metislayer2.eth
Through this proposal, Metis affirms its belief that resilience is built, not bought. Every holder, validator, and builder who participates in this vote strengthens the bridge between purpose and value, lighting the way for the next phase of our collective journey.
This proposal does not constitute financial advice. Token holders should conduct their own research and evaluation before voting. Technical implementation details, specific parameters, and timelines are subject to refinement based on operational requirements. The final interpretation of governance outcomes is the responsibility of the Metis Foundation, in coordination with the Governance Working Group, in accordance with established governance procedures.