Posted on behalf of the mStable ProtocolDAO
It is proposed that the signer with the address
0x0945b923d4922Bf30528931Ed92f1c20CEac9541
is removed from the ProtocolDAO multisig.
The ProtocolDAO nominates @rugolini with the address
0x6EbdF9240A5b6c6d69384c99BDc4c46df04Cb0Cf
as a signer for the multisig.
Should the signers be rotated as proposed?