• © Goverland Inc. 2026
  • v1.0.8
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
Nate DAONate DAOby0x66268791B55e1F5fA585D990326519F101407257nategeier.eth

Should we go all in on AI?

Voting ended 11 months agoFailed

Summary:

This proposal asks the community to vote on whether our DAO should commit significant resources and focus toward AI-related initiatives, tools, or integrations.

Motivation:

Artificial Intelligence is reshaping industries across the board — from productivity and governance to DeFi, art, and social coordination. Projects that adopt AI early may gain operational advantages, improve user experience, and unlock entirely new on-chain use cases.

By going “all in” on AI, we would actively explore: • AI-powered governance tools (e.g. agent-based voting, autonomous proposal generation) • LLM-integrated DAO operations (summarization, sentiment analysis, coordination bots) • AI-driven products or services (e.g. predictive analytics, user agents, on-chain assistants)

Scope of “All In”:

If this proposal passes, the DAO will: • Allocate up to X% of treasury or $X for AI initiatives • Launch an AI working group to: • Evaluate opportunities • Partner with AI-native protocols and teams • Build internal prototypes or MVPs • Explore grants or bounties for AI developers in Web3

Benefits: • First-mover advantage in on-chain AI • Stronger DAO tooling and automation • Expanded use cases and community engagement • Future-proofing the DAO’s operations

Risks: • Misallocation of funds if AI initiatives don’t deliver short-term ROI • Potential technical or ethical concerns in AI deployment • Need for careful governance to avoid AI decision-making overreach

Off-Chain Vote

For
0 0%
Against
0 0%
Abstain
0 0%
Download mobile app to vote

Timeline

Aug 25, 2025Proposal created
Aug 25, 2025Proposal vote started
Aug 28, 2025Proposal vote ended
Jul 09, 2026Proposal updated