• © Goverland Inc. 2026
  • v1.0.8
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
NFTXNFTXby0x4eAc46c2472b32dc7158110825A7443D35a90168javery.eth

XIP#42 : Update (reduce) global fees

Voting ended almost 3 years agoSucceeded

TL;DR - Cut global default fees in half.

Summary

The current default fees will be cut by half, and assess for 30 days:

  • 5% mint
  • 2% random redeem
  • 3% target redeem
  • 2% random swap
  • 5% target swap

Any vaults that have set custom fees would not be affected. This change will only impact vaults that are using the defaults.

Rationale

The rationale has been taken directly from the forum proposal which achieved quorum and passed 100% For the change.

The current global fees for the protocol are set as:

  • 10% mint (sell)
  • 4% random redeem
  • 6% target redeem (buy)
  • 4% random swap
  • 10% target swap

Vault activity has been on a steady downtrend since more marketplaces entered the fold in 2022.

While the global fees were acceptable back in 2021 when NFT liquidity was a somewhat novel mechanism and OpenSea’s fee+royalty regularly took 7.5%, things have now changed. As marketplaces race to the bottom with zero royalty and zero fee offerings it puts the NFTX vaults at the edge of floor price ranges and requires larger price swings in collections before users or arb bots are enticed to use them. The kicker being that due to bid incentivisation for NFT liquidity on platforms such as Blur, it takes a lot more activity to move that price.

NFTX V3 solves for this by allowing users to set custom price ranges, but until that is launched I believe we should drastically decrease the current global fee settings to levels that are more inline with the NFT liquidity sector in 2023.

One of the lines of thinking has been “if fees are high it doesn’t require much activity to keep yields up”. We have seen whale LPs like FloorDAO continually reduce the fees of vaults like Milady, bringing spot price much closer to other marketplaces, which increases activity and therefore yield. This is also something that has been mentioned to us by an arbitrage bot maintainer. Quoted below:

However, there were 87 other opportunities for arb between Marketplace-X <> NFTX that didn’t land, because transaction cost would negate any potential profit (or it’d actually lose on the arb). Looking quickly through those missed opportunities, I can already see another 10 being successful, if mint fee would be on average lower by 2% (eg. Goblins Vault has got mint fee of 4%, if it was 2%, 4 of those opportunities would go through, netting people who are LPing 2% of 4 mints - which obviously is more than 4% of 0 mints). If the aim is to maximise yield for liquidity providers, it is likely that by lowering fees, vaults would attract more volume generating better returns for LPs (kind of like smaller piece, of bigger cake)

Opportunity

Updating the fee structure for will increase the fees generated and improve the APRs for the NFTX vaults.

Risk

  • The fee decrease could not generate additional activity on the vaults and cause a negative impact on fee generation.
  • The fees are fixed for 30 days after changes.

Specifications

If this proposal passes, we will update the global default fee structure to :

  • 5% mint (sell)
  • 2% random redeem (random buy)
  • 3% target redeem (target buy)
  • 2% random swap
  • 5% target swap

You can check the vaults that will be impacted by this change through this GraphQL query.

Funding request

No. This request requires no funding.

Communication

  • Forum: NFTX

Quorum

  • Minimum Quorum: More than 10% of circulating, non-treasury NFTX must participate for a proposal to Pass.
  • Passing Threshold: More than 50% of voting tokens must vote FOR for the XIP to Pass. For changes to the NFTX contract, more than 70% of voting tokens must vote FOR for the XIP to pass.

Off-Chain Vote

Yes, reduce global fees
51.19K NFTX100%
No
0 NFTX0%
Download mobile app to vote

Discussion

NFTXXIP#42 : Update (reduce) global fees

Timeline

Apr 13, 2023Proposal created
Apr 13, 2023Proposal vote started
Apr 16, 2023Proposal vote ended
Jun 05, 2024Proposal updated