ChopChop
Floor priced NFT Vaults
This proposal is intended to sell off all non-floor NFT assets held by NFTX v1 vaults for ETH and/or stable coins. This will act as a buyout mechanism for v1 vault token holders. As a secondary effect, this helps rebalance the DAO treasury to be (a bit) less exposed to the NFT markets, as the NFTX DAO holds a majority of these v1 vault tokens on its balance sheet.
With NFTX v2 being introduced in June, the DAO is currently migrating DAO-owned liquidity from v1 vaults towards v2 vaults, while collapsing some close-to-equal v1 vaults such as PUNK-BASIC, PUNK-FEMALE and PUNK-ATTR-4 into one v2 vault, namely $PUNK. This is done to further optimize the use of v2 vaults, both bringing deeper liquidity to AMM pools causing less slippage, as well as offering a broader inventory for retail users that want to buy a specific NFT from a vault.
With this said, there are a couple v1 genesis vaults that hold non-floor priced NFT assets as collateral (NFTs which are considered of higher value and/or rarity). As NFTX isn’t optimized for fractionalizing higher-value assets due to not having a protocol vault buyout mechanism, selling off collateral and distributing rewards to token holders looks like a valid alternative to unwind these vaults.
Many of the vault tokens are still 100% owned by the DAO (i.e. Axie Mystics) due to never being listed on an AMM, while some have been distributed more widely (i.e. PUNK-ZOMBIE). Thus in many of the proposed selling/auctioning of NFTs, this means that the DAO would be liquidating non-floor assets on its’ balance sheet in return for either ETH and DAI/USDC. In other scenarios, such as the PUNK-ZOMBIE vault, it’d act as both a buyout mechanism for retail token holders, as well as diversification for DAO treasury.
The full list of vaults applying to this draft proposal are:
If this proposal passes, we will redeem collateral from the above listed v1 genesis vaults through an Aragon NFTX DAO vote, and offer them on their respective marketplaces at predefined rates (Average going rate of rarity, reweight & drop by 5% if not sold in a month).
Example 1 (Tokens distributed over multiple holders): A vault that holds 2 high-value NFTs has its tokens distributed to 20 owners, all owning 5% of the supply. The 2 NFTs collectively generate 400 ETH worth of sales. After both NFTs are sold, the 400 ETH gets deposited in a claim contract. Owning 5% of the vault tokens allows you to claim 20 ETH from the contract (5% of 400 ETH), burning your vault tokens in the process. This contract remains in claim mode forever, causing the vault tokens to never be unbacked by sales generated.
Example 2 (Tokens held by one owner, i.e. the DAO): A vault that holds 2 high-value NFTs has its tokens distributed to 1 owner. The owner redeems all NFTs from the vault and lists them for sale. Generated sales are collected by the owner and diversified into other currencies (i.e. USDC or DAI) after.
If this proposal would pass, this would mean that:
In order to execute this proposal, all NFT collateral in the vaults listed under specifications would be required to be withdrawn through an on-chain governance vote (Aragon), with the purpose of listing on secondary markets.