Adressing the spam polls

I believe that all OHMIES can agree that the ridiculous polls are getting out of hand. As a growing community that has very serious aspirations, we have to do something to resolve this issue. It is not only nefarious to our ability to communicate but also to the image of this project.

The classic proposition that I see is to put a minimum balance required to publish propositions. I do not believe this is a fair proposition, it is widely undemocratic, to say the least. It will render the community governance narrative obsolete as only a few will be able to voice their ideas.

The second method is a slicing method that financially punishes spam propositions. Everything considered this option does seem like the most attractive to me.

Indeed, Olympus would have to create an obligatory present voting poll "spam". If OHMIES believe this prop is spam then they will vote in the "SPAM" poll.

If the spam answer to the snapshot is higher than 90% the author will lose their s/gOHM

This OHM could be used by the DAO to reward the authors of the best proposals of the month (measured in the number of total votes or a voting poll with the best proposal of the month could be created, first takes 50%, second takes 30% third takes 20%).

2. TLDR: No minimum OHM balance to create a proposal, however, authors of spam propositions that will be flagged by the obligatory extra voting option "spam" (90%<) will lose their s/gOHM which will be placed in a wallet that will be used to reward the authors with the best proposals of the month (measured in the number of total votes or through an official vote of the best prop of the month).