• Β© Goverland Inc. 2026
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
Pear ProtocolPear Protocolby0x6ee5aEe6c8148285F4d156b5B5732659c6F7Bb4C0x6ee5…Bb4C

Update to Pear Protocol Fee Structure

Voting ended 9 months agoSucceeded

🏷 Summary

This proposal seeks DAO consensus on updating the Pear Protocol trading fee structure ahead of the Hyperliquid Engine launch. We aim to shift from the current 0.13% default rate to a sustainable long-term fee model. The proposed change will also be applied to ALL other trading engines. Our recommended structure is 0.06% to open and 0.06% to close, balancing trader competitiveness with strong returns for PEAR stakers (stPEAR) who receive 80% of protocol revenue.

πŸ“œ Context

Default Fee: 0.13% open / 0.13% close β†’ Helped monetise early attention on the protocol but was largely subsidised via LTIPP grants from Arbitrum and led to unhappy and unprofitable users β†’ Initially great for stakers, but limited returning daily active users and discouraged any whale traders

Promotional Fee: 0.02% open / 0.02% close β†’ Led to $3M–$5M daily volume growth β†’ Great for traders, but staker yield dropped sharply

The DAO now faces a strategic decision: Should we optimize for raw trader volume, long-term revenue, or a sweet spot in between?

πŸ“Š Benchmarking Against Centralized Venues For context, major venues using market orders charge:

Binance: ~0.04%–0.08% taker fees Hyperliquid: ~0.03%–0.05% taker fees

πŸ“Œ Takeaway: A 0.06% fee keeps us highly competitive, especially considering our DeFi-native benefits and composability. Onward execution costs for users will be minimised through internal means.

🎯 Rationale for 0.06% The recommended 0.06% open/close fee is:

βœ… Low enough to retain active traders and momentum from recent growth πŸ’° High enough to meaningfully reward PEAR stakers and build a sustainable treasury βš™οΈ Optimized for upcoming Hyperliquid Engine, where enhanced execution and automation will justify slightly higher fees

We've received feedback from both traders and stakersβ€”0.06% is the Goldilocks zone.

πŸ”’ Voting Options

Select one of the following fee structures (applies to both open & close): βš–οΈ 0.04% Open / 0.04% Close β€’ Lower fees for traders β€’ Risks underpaying stakers, may not scale with usage

βœ… 0.06% Open / 0.06% Close (Recommended) β€’ Competitive fee, strong revenue flow to DAO β€’ Aligns trader and staker incentives β€’ Best positioned for HL Engine era

🚫 0.13% Open / 0.13% Close (Original Default) β€’ High staker yield β€’ Proven deterrent to volume growth

πŸ—“οΈ Timeline Voting Opens: 12/05/2025 Voting Closes: 26/05/2025

Fee Change (if passed): Upon Hyperliquid Launch (scheduled for after Voting closes)

πŸ”— Resources

πŸ“Š Protocol Analytics: https://dune.com/pear_protocol/pear-protocol πŸ’¬ Community Discussion: discord.gg/pearprotocol -> Governance πŸ› οΈ Hyperliquid Engine Preview: Please join the discord and open a #ticket for closed beta access

Off-Chain Vote

0.04%
4.26M stPEAR10.2%
0.06% [Recommended[
37.54M stPEAR89.8%
0.13%
0 stPEAR0%
Download mobile app to vote

Discussion

Pear ProtocolUpdate to Pear Protocol Fee Structure

Timeline

May 12, 2025Proposal created
May 12, 2025Proposal vote started
May 22, 2025Proposal vote ended
May 22, 2025Proposal updated