π· Summary
This proposal seeks DAO consensus on updating the Pear Protocol trading fee structure ahead of the Hyperliquid Engine launch. We aim to shift from the current 0.13% default rate to a sustainable long-term fee model. The proposed change will also be applied to ALL other trading engines. Our recommended structure is 0.06% to open and 0.06% to close, balancing trader competitiveness with strong returns for PEAR stakers (stPEAR) who receive 80% of protocol revenue.
π Context
Default Fee: 0.13% open / 0.13% close β Helped monetise early attention on the protocol but was largely subsidised via LTIPP grants from Arbitrum and led to unhappy and unprofitable users β Initially great for stakers, but limited returning daily active users and discouraged any whale traders
Promotional Fee: 0.02% open / 0.02% close β Led to $3Mβ$5M daily volume growth β Great for traders, but staker yield dropped sharply
The DAO now faces a strategic decision: Should we optimize for raw trader volume, long-term revenue, or a sweet spot in between?
π Benchmarking Against Centralized Venues For context, major venues using market orders charge:
Binance: ~0.04%β0.08% taker fees Hyperliquid: ~0.03%β0.05% taker fees
π Takeaway: A 0.06% fee keeps us highly competitive, especially considering our DeFi-native benefits and composability. Onward execution costs for users will be minimised through internal means.
π― Rationale for 0.06% The recommended 0.06% open/close fee is:
β Low enough to retain active traders and momentum from recent growth π° High enough to meaningfully reward PEAR stakers and build a sustainable treasury βοΈ Optimized for upcoming Hyperliquid Engine, where enhanced execution and automation will justify slightly higher fees
We've received feedback from both traders and stakersβ0.06% is the Goldilocks zone.
π’ Voting Options
Select one of the following fee structures (applies to both open & close): βοΈ 0.04% Open / 0.04% Close β’ Lower fees for traders β’ Risks underpaying stakers, may not scale with usage
β 0.06% Open / 0.06% Close (Recommended) β’ Competitive fee, strong revenue flow to DAO β’ Aligns trader and staker incentives β’ Best positioned for HL Engine era
π« 0.13% Open / 0.13% Close (Original Default) β’ High staker yield β’ Proven deterrent to volume growth
ποΈ Timeline Voting Opens: 12/05/2025 Voting Closes: 26/05/2025
Fee Change (if passed): Upon Hyperliquid Launch (scheduled for after Voting closes)
π Resources
π Protocol Analytics: https://dune.com/pear_protocol/pear-protocol π¬ Community Discussion: discord.gg/pearprotocol -> Governance π οΈ Hyperliquid Engine Preview: Please join the discord and open a #ticket for closed beta access
Off-Chain Vote
Loadingβ¦
- Author
0x6ee5β¦Bb4C
- IPFS#bafkreih
- Voting Systemsingle-choice
- Start DateMay 12, 2025
- End DateMay 22, 2025
- Total Votes Cast41.8M stPEAR
- Total Voters87
Discussion
Timeline
- May 12, 2025Proposal created
- May 12, 2025Proposal vote started
- May 22, 2025Proposal vote ended
- May 22, 2025Proposal updated