#9 - Fish Ownership

Recently, Community members have pointed out that they would like the ownership to the fish contract to be renounced so that no mint/burn of 🐟 will ever be possible.

Originally, I, Hiturunk.Eth, had conceived that the upcoming Castle DAO could have wanted to use these functions, but I believe it is worth putting up to a vote.

Benefits of Option #1: Renounce Ownership:

• Totally Static supply, There will only ever be 200k fish.
• Easy to trust, nobody has power to do mint/burn.

Benefits of Option #2: Transfer Ownership to Castle DAO when it comes out.

• Requires some trust in the DAO's code authoring, and in me to hold ownership until the DAO is completely ready to be deployed.
• Gives DAO handy powers to govern fish [for example, replacing a user's misplaced funds, burning the fish of a known hacker, inflating the supply in some way the community wants, etc]

My recommendation is for option #2, but I will faithfully execute the option selected by majority vote. This poll will run for one Week, to give everyone ample time to vote.

As well, I will refrain from voting since this poll has to do with trust in me in the first place.

Signed, Hiturunk.ETH