With the CLAMM LP and D2 vault allocations done at a total $1.05M, and the original approved range of a $1.5-2M productive treasury, we lift a proposal on an allocation to Radiant farms up for discussion.
Current allocations (With xGrail looking like a Dividend allocation):
| Value allocated | Token from treasury | Destination |
|---|---|---|
| $300k | ARB | D2 plsOMM++ vault |
| $150k | ETH | Orange CLAMM ETH vaults |
| $125k | ARB | Orange CLAMM ETH vaults |
| $225k | ARB | Orange CLAMM ARB vaults |
| $200k | GLP | Orange CLAMM BTC vaults |
| $25k | ARB | Orange CLAMM BTC vaults |
| $190k | xGrail | Camelot Dividends plugin |
This leaves us with the following assets can use (prices from 8/7): $180k ARB in Multisig 2 $290k GLP in Fee Collector 1 $70k WETH in Multisig 1
We want to consider allocating up to $200k worth of assets to the farms on Radiant after staking the $200k xGrail based on the outcome of the xGrail stake proposal
Radiant is one of our most important partners as we have over 1.6M max-locked dLP through plsRDNT. The potential of this dLP has not been used by Plutus thus far.
Besides Radiant, GMX has been one of Plutus first partners and it might be time to breathe some life to that long lasting partnership. Allocating funds to the gmBTC-USDC and gmETH-USDC farms on Radiant would tick both of these boxes.
Radiant DAO’s mission is to unify the billions in fragmented liquidity across Web3 money markets under one safe, user-friendly, and capital-efficient omnichain protocol. We can in turn unleash its full potential with our max-locked dLP.
We choose to farm on Radiant for 3 reasons.
gmETH-USD gmBTC-USD Single USDC farm
USDC farm
Through this farm we make the most use of our max locked DLP. The current APR on this vault is:
| Leverage | APR | Funding rate | Projected net APR | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| USDC on Arbitrum | ||||
| 1x | 9.14% | n/a | 9.14% | below the minimum 15% target |
| 2x | 21.7% | -6.27% | 15.42% | Healthfactor 1.68 |
| 3x | 38.64% | -16.22% | 22.42% | Healthfactor 1.27 |
| 4x | 55.25% | -25.97% | 29.28% | Healthfactor 1.13 |
| USDC on Ethereum | ||||
| 1x | 8.96% | n/a | 8.96 | below our 15% minimum target |
| 2x | 28.97% | -9.81% | 18.97% | Healthfactor 1.64 |
| 3x | 51.19% | -22.4% | 28.79% | Healthfactor 1.24 |
| 4x | 73.14% | -34.73% | 39.4% | Healthfactor 1.13 |
How degen we go with this is one of the main things we would like some discussion on before putting it to a vote.
GM vaults
The GM farms were chosen because they offer the most attractive yield without leverage.
gmETH-USD vault:
gmBTC-USD vault:
Even without the ARB STIPP boost the yield remains attractive between 15-30%. Even at a minimum above our 15% target rate for the productive treasury.
A GM pool (GMX Market pool) consists of:
Since tokens in a market are reserved based on the total open interest of the market, the liquidity available for redemption is capped at the tokens in the pool multiplied by the pool's reserve factor minus the tokens reserved. If this capacity is reached, liquidity providers would need to wait for positions to close before selling the GM token or for liquidity to be deposited by other providers. The borrow fee rate in this case would also be higher which should help to incentivise deposits.
The price of the GM token depends on the price of the long / short tokens and the net pending PnL of traders' open positions. Fees from leverage trading and swaps will automatically increase the price of GM tokens.
GM pools aim to maintain an equal worth of long and short tokens, e.g. when the price of a long token increases there may be a positive price impact to incentivise selling long tokens for short tokens to rebalance the pool.
While this balancing is incentivised by the pool it is still possible for pools not to be balanced at times. If a pool keeps its balance, its pricing excluding PnL should mimic a pool that is 50% long token and 50% short token and that rebalances as price changes. It is however not guaranteed that long and short positions will always be balanced.
An additional case to note is that if, for example, long positions happen to be balanced with high leverage short positions and there is a sudden price spike, the high leverage short positions could be liquidated, temporarily causing an imbalance of longs and shorts. An attempt to mitigate this risk is made through funding fees and price impact.
Using the Radiant vault exposes us to three (3) types of risk:
Radiant conducted multiple top-to-bottom v2 audits with Open Zeppelin, Peckshield, and Zokyo with zero unresolved critical or high issues. BlockSec was also hired for whitehat hacking with zero unresolved issues.
GMX, is a battle tested Arbitrum OG protocol and has had several audits. The GMX V2 products alone have had 4 audits (latest one last month).
Currently the USD farms have about $28M TVL and the gm farms have about $10M TVL.
We plan distribute deposits in both the gmETH and gmBTC farms and weigh them towards the better yielding pair and offer a higher yield + more convenience for the LP’s. Hopefully Radiant will add more gmpairs to their farms.
We plan to distribute between the different usd farms available (on all chains) and weigh towards the best yielding farms to provide optimal yield using 2-3x leverage. Again providing a higher yield and more convenience than providing yourself.
By offering a superior yield we can attract part of current and optimally new TVL. It would not be vampiric to Radiant because the TVL remains in the gm vaults. Potentially attracting new liquidity and considering a potential $200k of productive treasury liquidity further sweetens the deal.
With our max-locked dLP we can service around $10M TVL which makes for an attractive market to address.
Based on the current 30-40% APR, a estimated minimum of 15% APR is realistic without incentives. By allocating up to $200k we expect good annualized rewards at the cost of some added smart contract and some counterparty risk. We feel this is an acceptable trade-off. The rewards will be split between the treasury and bPLS holders 50/50.
On top of purely being a productive treasury allocation there are also two added benefits.
TBD
Based on discussion over the course of the first week of this proposal we will fill in options 1-3 for voting. The amount of tokens to allocate, where and whether to allocate them and potential other considerations will be filled in before voting starts.
To protect the treasury and maintain a dynamic response to market conditions or contract security issues, the Plutus core team and multisig members reserve the rights to withdraw at their discretion any or all funds from contracts approved by Plutus DAO for productive treasury allocation. Any withdrawals or alterations made by the team and multisig members will be made with a preference for in-kind withdrawal, and will be announced and reported with reasons.