Previously, PolyVertex had used 100x for natives, 5x for non-natives, and partnership pools were at 6-12x depending on the size of the partner. It seemed to work well, and PolyVertex still cranked out profits for a long time. I believe we should continue with this concept but adjust it for the new farming structure, since the quantity of native pools/farms is doubling.
I will be referring standard LP's as 2D liquidity and secondary market LP's as 3D liquidity. The idea is that staking a single asset is 1 dimensional. Staking an LP is 2 dimensional since it has two assets, but staking an LP of an LP is 3D, if you catch my drift.
Here is the proposed structure:
Here is an example allocation point breakdown:
Asset || AllocPt
=========================
VERT || 50x
VERT-WETH || 50x
VERT-WBTC || 50x
VERT-MIM || 50x
VERT-GMX || 50x
VERT-WETH/WETH || 50x **
VERT-WBTC/WBTC || 50x **
VERT-MIM/MIM || 50x **
VERT-GMX/GMX || 50x **
ARBIS || 12x
WETH-MIM || 5x
WETH-GMX || 5x
WETH-WBTC || 5x
WBTC-MIM || 5x
MIM-DAI || 5x
SPELL-MIM || 5x
WETH || 5x
WBTC || 5x
MIM || 5x
DAI || 5x
USDC || 5x
USDT || 5x
GMX || 5x
GOHM || 5x
SPELL || 5x
MKR || 5x
GRT || 5x
LINK || 5x
** NOTE: With EmpireDEX, we are permanently locking all VERT liquidity, including user created liquidity, so in order to cash out the LP's without breaking them, a secondary marketplace must form. This is done by pairing the locked LP with another asset to give the LP tradeable value. This relationship is denoted by VERT-???/??? where ??? is the asset. Cascading liquidity in this way separates liquidity dumping from the native token and thus creates a more sustainable farming experience. For more information, click here. **
If you agree with this model, choose "Yes". If you believe you have a better idea, comment first your better idea below, then choose, "No. I have a better idea." If you wish to abstain but help quorum along, choose, "Abstain."
Vote wisely ;)