
This proposal seeks to address the long-term success of the Radiant protocol by means of adjusting the rate of Arbitrum RDNT emissions to more sustainable levels.
Whereas the front-loaded emissions structure was a tool used to promote utility for RDNT, Radiant Capital is currently “over-emitting” into the protocol, relative to the protocol fees being generated. Consequently, this emissions structure dilutes current RDNT in circulation at an unsustainable rate.
In order to achieve Radiant’s omnichain vision, we must earmark emissions for our forthcoming deployment on BNB Chain, as well as other networks that will be supported in succession. This change must be effected in order to attract new users while still maintaining competitive yields when compared to other DeFi money markets.
RFP-2 aligns with the Radiant DAO’s core principles of Determination and Collective Benefit. Long-term sustainability is imperative to the success of the protocol and subsequently, its community. It is important for the Radiant DAO to make critical adjustments such as these in order to ensure the best possible product.
The objectives of reducing emissions are as follows:
Given the immutability of the Radiant smart contracts, we can’t simply “dial down” emissions. Instead, we propose to direct RDNT emissions into a DAO-governed multisig wallet (the “RDNT DAO Reserve”).
The RDNT DAO Reserve will be governed by RDNT tokenholders and executed by a Council-directed 2-of-3 multisig. It will be responsible for major emissions allocation changes, as well as for the routing of extant emissions across current and subsequent chain deployments.
The Council proposes the following percentage reductions to the current token emission structure::
By doing a straight reduction of team emissions by 50% while keeping the total supply at 1B tokens, the original team allocation would effectively be reduced from 20% to 10% of the fully diluted supply.
Consequently, this proposal recommends that the original team allocation remain at a 20% share of the circulating token supply, such that if a future proposal were to recommend an allocation from the RDNT DAO reserve (e.g., for BNB emissions), the original team allocation of the circulating supply would remain equal to 20%.
This aligns with our initial vision and would prevent the Team from being issued too many or too few tokens relative to the total in circulation. Furthermore, it ensures that the Team’s total number of tokens will grow as the protocol expands, in accordance with the original emission schedule published at protocol genesis.
No significant operational costs.
It is possible that we will see a decrease in Arbitrum TVL in the short term due to the lowering of yields. However, we believe that emissions will be better served by the RDNT DAO Reserve, and that they will likely be put to better use on subsequent chain deployments, relative to the current structure (with all emissions focused on Arbitrum). The belief is that this to be in the best long-term interest of the protocol, in order to achieve its omnichain vision.
The utility of Radiant will be enhanced because yields will remain competitive for lenders, even with the proposed emission reductions. Furthermore, the "real yield" earned from locking RDNT remains industry-leading (currently >150% in BTC/ETH/Stables), relative to competitive money markets. Consequently, while we can’t predict the future, we don't anticipate emission reductions as outlined in this proposal to induce significant retail migration to other yield platforms.