• © Goverland Inc. 2026
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
Rejuve.AIRejuve.AIby0xD97e099FbDF4ceAdD036AEa92260677aAB759F3dCole Bartlett

Test - Governance Vote #2: Buyback vs Buyback-and-Burn

Voting ended 2 months agoSucceeded

Overview

Following the stabilization framework introduced by the SCI-Fi Protocol, this vote determines how Rejuve.AI manages fiat and protocol-generated revenues to reinforce $RJV value, maintain long-term sustainability, and align with our biologically inspired economy.

Two pathways are proposed for community decision:

Option A — Buyback-Only (Default Plan)

  • Goal: Sustain $RJV’s market health and liquidity through ongoing treasury-managed buybacks.

Mechanism

  • A defined portion (community-amendable %: e.g., 10–25 %) of net fiat and protocol revenues (subscription fees, partner commissions, study sponsorships) is allocated for periodic $RJV buybacks.
  • Purchased tokens are retained in treasury reserves or redeployed to liquidity pools to maintain peg stability and support in-app pricing under the SCI-Fi model.
  • Buyback frequency and amount dynamically adjust based on SCI deviations and market liquidity conditions.

Analogy

  • Like a biological feedback system, buybacks act as homeostatic regulation—absorbing volatility and redistributing nutrients (liquidity) where the ecosystem needs them most.

Option B — Buyback + Burn (Adaptive Burn)

  • Goal: Add a deflationary mechanism that removes excess tokens under specific “stress” or “stagnation” conditions.

Mechanism

  • A base portion (community-amendable %: e.g., 5–20 %) of each buyback cycle is permanently burned, reducing circulating supply.
  • Burns are activated or scaled by biologically inspired triggers, signaling inefficiency or under-activity in the network.

Screenshot 2025-11-17 at 6.53.15 AM.png

Each trigger would be governed by on-chain or oracle-fed data once available; early iterations may rely on quarterly treasury reporting.

Analogy

  • In biological terms, this is autophagy—the clearing of cellular debris to maintain vitality. Burn events prune inefficiency and regenerate balance, preventing “toxic buildup” of idle tokens.

Community Amendments & Parameters

Both options allow proposals to adjust:

  • Revenue allocation percentages for buybacks/burns
  • Trigger definitions and thresholds
  • Reporting frequency and transparency requirements
  • Trial activity or data volume metrics used as inputs

Amendments must maintain overall compliance with the SCI-Fi stabilization framework.

Off-Chain Vote

Option A - Buyback-Only
6.29K RJV25.3%
Option B - Buyback + Burn
18.6K RJV74.7%
Download mobile app to vote

Timeline

Nov 19, 2025Proposal created
Nov 19, 2025Proposal vote started
Nov 23, 2025Proposal vote ended
Dec 03, 2025Proposal updated