[SEP 45] Implementation of Transition Period for Committees and Councils Structure

Please refer to the full proposal text on the SafeDAO forum. Some parts may have been removed to fit within the character limit on Snapshot.

Authors:

Andre Geest (Safe, @Andre), Amy (Safe, @amy.sg)

Created:

2024-09-09

Abstract

This proposal aims to signal SafeDAO’s intent to move forward with a Committees and Councils Structure and introduce a transition period to allow sufficient time for its full implementation. The proposal includes the temporary pause for funding new OBRA initiatives and an extension of the soft launch provision for Season 4.

Proposal types

[ ] SEP: Constitutional Proposals [X] SEP: Governance Proposals [ ] Other SEPs

Proposal details

Purpose and Background

Background:

In this governance amendment sprint, the Committees and Council Structure proposal was introduced to resolve SafeDAO’s most pressing resource allocation pain points. However, the robustness of the proposal deserves ample time to discuss, shape and transition into the structure.

By allowing this transition period, SafeDAO ensures that the governance structure is carefully considered and well-aligned with the goals as outlined in its Constitution. Pausing OBRA during this time helps maintain focus on the strategic shift and mitigates risks associated with overlapping governance structures.

Proposal Details:

1. Signal support for committees and councils structure

• The ratification of this proposal signals the intention to move forward with the proposed Committees and Councils Structure, as outlined in the Committees and Council Structure Proposal.
• While this signaling is non-binding, (the Committees and Council Structure proposal must be separately formally ratified through a vote to be implemented), it serves as a strategic direction for governance improvements.
• Full details of the structure, responsibilities, and processes will be iterated on until submission into Phase 1 by the Governance team for Season 4 Sprint 1 with the proposal intended to go into effect in Season 4 Sprint 2.

2. Pause new OBRA initiatives for Season 4 Sprint 1

• To ensure a smooth transition to the new governance model, OBRA (Outcomes-based resource allocation) will be paused for one sprint until the full implementation of the council structure in Season 4 Sprint 2.
• During the pause, no new funding initiatives can be submitted through OBRA, allowing the DAO to focus on finalizing the council structure.
• Initiatives with ongoing funding are not affected.

3. Extension of Soft Launch Provision

• At the launch of the governance framework, a soft launch provision was implemented, which allows the SEF to deviate from the governance cycles if necessary to give SafeDAO the possibility to vote in a flexible manner, ensuring an efficient decision-making process. This has been extended for subsequent seasons.
• The soft launch provision for the governance framework and OBRA will be extended for the entirety of Season 4.
• This will provide time for further refinement and feedback on the proposed structure before full rollout in Season 4 Sprint 2, ensuring the governance framework aligns with DAO goals and needs.

Timeline:

• Season 4 Sprint 1: Governance team to finalize details for the Committees and Councils Structure.
• Season 4 Sprint 2: Full implementation of the Committees and Councils Structure and resumption of OBRA.

Effects and Impact Analysis

1. This proposal signals support for the transition to the Committees and Councils Structure: This signal is non-binding, yet offers a strategic direction for governance improvements.

2. This proposal suggests no new OBRA funding initiatives submitted for Season 4 Sprint 1: The temporary pause on new OBRA initiatives ensures focus on the transition without overlapping frameworks. While this may delay new funding initiatives, it promotes a more cohesive governance model.

3. This proposal extends the soft launch provision: This extension prevents the transition being faced by the governance cycles as a roadblock, providing flexibility to refine and propose changes to the structure at any sprint in the season based on feedback.

Alternative Solutions

1. Immediate implementation of the Committees and Councils Structure: This approach could create confusion and inefficiencies due to insufficient time for proper planning and feedback, leading to potential governance misalignment.
2. Continuation of OBRA initiatives without pausing: This would result in overlapping governance structures where initiatives get funded although SafeDAO signaled to move to a new structure. This makes it harder to focus on the transition and dilutes attention from the new model's implementation. Additionally, pausing the acceptance of new initiatives also allows for prudent budgeting, as the funds can be strategically reallocated within the new council structure, enhancing financial efficiency.
3. Delaying the transition until Season 5: While providing more time, it risks significantly delaying necessary governance improvements.

Implementation

[X ] Own implementation possible [ ] Own implementation but with funding (how much % to implementation) [ ] Request for technical support through Safe matter experts

Open Questions

Copyright

Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.