End Dates and Exit Plans for DAO Proposals and Grant Requests

by 0x7bbea9c18cd0541acab8c19da2b11d0c03faef1c (1Existence)

Overview: Should certain proposals, such as those involving DAO positions, include a specified end date to allow for a formal review or analysis of the value provided by the project or individual? This would ensure that ongoing efforts are evaluated for their effectiveness and relevance over time.

Additionally, should all grant requests be required to include a comprehensive exit plan? Inspired by @Canessadcl's idea, this suggestion addresses the issue where grantees frequently return for additional funding to continue projects. This often puts the community in a difficult position—either allocate more funds to sustain an active project or allow it to stagnate in Genesis City, potentially becoming outdated and underutilized.

Objective: This poll seeks community input on:

1. Identifying which types of proposals should have mandated end dates for periodic review.
2. Determining how best to phrase these requirements within the proposal applications.

Please note that this is an initial poll. There are two additional steps required for these suggestions to become formal policy.

Your insights and ideas are invaluable to refining this proposal.

Thank you,

1Existence

• YES
• NO
• Invalid question/options

This proposal is summarized due to technical limitations. To view it complete and vote on it, visit the DCL DAO Governance dApp