by 0xd4f1cab694c4424c4796549edbb9b489789f4df5 (TudaMoon)
Grant Support Squad brought in a governance proposal and has failed to do their duties according to the enacted governance proposal they have created. https://governance.decentraland.org/proposal/?id=ce104d00-7d94-11ed-8456-a323c09ee17e
This governance proposal is for the creation of the Accountability Committee (to be later renamed by DAO to Revocations Committee) and it provides the new procedure that they are supposed to follow.

It states "The Grant Support Squad will request the grantee to respond to the concerns raised and if the concerns continue, they will send the arguments for the Accountability Committee to evaluate the case. This triggers a preventive revocation or a pause to the Vesting Contract."
The concerns raised are the DAO community member's concerns. The reason you can come to that conclusion is because in number 1 it talks about Community Members using a form to submit them. There is no definition of concern and since there is no definition, it doesn't exclude any type of concerns. It would cover all concerns.
That means if there is a continuous concern, even after the information requested from the grantee, it is the duty of the GSS to send the arguments to the Revocations Squad. At that point in time, the vesting contract is paused.
Pause the Vesting Contract of the Grant Support Squad's current grant until these rules implemented by the DAO are followed by the Grant Support Squad. Their grant will be un-paused by only one (1) voting stage through a governance pre-proposal poll.