Should Monetization Replace In-World Grants?

by 0xe945ed0530da54c1af15c6b034be9ef3e6bbe7b1 (OGContraBand)

In-world grants have been frozen which goes against the manifesto of improving and investing in in-world content. Should the following monetization system replace in-world grants?

System: Rather than having grants DCL-Metrics are used to distribute in-world grant funds as a percentage of user traffic generated by lands and worlds.

Benefits: 1 - There is no future projection, failed projects, rugs - everything is retroactive and simple - you get users you get reward 2 - Reduction of corruption. Currently new user has zero percent change of getting a grant unless maybe they have a connection to a legislator or a million dollar bill in their back pocket. New user does not have to appease the king and queen of Decentraland.
3 - Expected explosive growth. If you don't understand why this would create explosive growth then you never tried to make more than 10 dollars on something related to art. People go wild for the change to make a few bucks on monetization - see youtube for an example.

If you do this as soon as possible Decentraland will be saved guaranteed. Land sales will go wild and Mana will skyrocket. Quite frankly those complaining about the platform just don't know how to code and problems solve. Come out to 27,24 and you'll see someone can create a game as good as Nifty Island here. Try the Laser Gun v1.7 you'll see cool MOBA, FBS games can be made here without any help or aid by a good programmer just reading the docs, programming and debugging. Sure there are bugs, but currently there's work arounds and a way to get what you need to get done done here and create something amazing.

• Yes - replace in-world grants with monetization
• No
• Invalid question/options

This proposal is summarized due to technical limitations. To view it complete and vote on it, visit the DCL DAO Governance dApp