Set duration period for DAO Committee members

by 0x247e0896706bb09245549e476257a0a1129db418 (LordLike)

The absence of a period of duration for DAO committee members in Decentraland can lead to several potential issues, including:

1. Lack of accountability: Without a set term, committee members may not be held accountable for their actions, leading to potential abuses of power.

2. Lack of fresh perspectives: Without new members regularly joining the committee, the same individuals may hold power for an extended period of time, stifling innovation and new ideas.

3. Lack of trust: The absence of term limits may lead to concerns about the impartiality of the committee, as members may become entrenched in their positions and less responsive to the needs of the community.

4. Reduced democratic participation: The absence of term limits may discourage community members from participating in governance, as they may feel that their voices will not be heard.

It is important to balance the need for stability and consistency with the need for accountability, fresh perspectives, and democratic participation. A system with term limits and regular elections can help to address these potential issues.

There is a good example DAO can follow - Accountability Committee.

According to Article 5 of the Accountability Committee Framework:

"This Accountability Committee selected by the Decentraland DAO Community is expected to be in office for twelve (12) months and the members could be re-elected only for one consecutive period."

https://governance.decentraland.org/proposal/?id=ce104d00-7d94-11ed-8456-a323c09ee17e

Yes: Set duration period for DAO Committee members for 12 months and members re-election only for one consecutive period.

No: Leave as it is.

• Yes
• No
• Invalid question/options

Vote on this proposal on the Decentraland DAO