Community Feedback on Security Advisory Board

by 0x247e0896706bb09245549e476257a0a1129db418 (LordLike)

PROPOSAL PURPOSE

Due to the importance for the DAO and significant power held by SAB, such as the ability to halt DAO operations initiated by the DAO Committee or the Community, and holding multisig keys for most important DAO smart contracts, this proposal aims to start a public discussion about the Security Advisory Board, including but not limited:

• Who are the members of SAB ?

• How should SAB members be voted ? (requirements, qualifications etc.)

• Should SAB members receive compensation, and if so, how ? (on monthly or performance base)

• Should there be additional documentation and guidelines on SAB operations ?

• Should there be reports or updates from the SAB to the Community, and if so, when and in what form ?

• Should SAB members be interviewed by the Community or specific DAO Core Units once a certain period of time ? (For example, in Town Halls / private form)

WHAT IS SAB ?

The Security Advisory Board acts as a guarantor of Decentraland’s smart contract security, and is tasked with overseeing the work of the DAO Committee and responding to vulnerability and bug reports in any of Decentraland’s contracts.

The SAB includes 5 Solidity experts that have initially been selected by the Decentraland development team. Any time a modification is to be made to the LAND or Estate contracts, the update must be unanimously supported by the SAB’s multi-sig. At least three signatories are required with no dissenting votes in order to make any changes to the LAND or Estate contracts. The SAB has the ability to pause, resume, or cancel any action taken by the DAO Committee.

Initiating the addition or removal of a member of the SAB can be done by kickstarting a Governance proposal process on governance.decentraland.org.

Please share your ideas and concerns related to this proposal in the DAO Discord or comments (forum post).

VOTING OPTIONS:

YES: I support Community Feedback on SAB

NO: Leave as it is

• YES
• NO
• Invalid question/options

This proposal is summarized due to technical limitations. To view it complete and vote on it, visit the DCL DAO Governance dApp