Should the GSS have to become officials to the DAO?

by 0xed0e0cb94f60f72ec94bef848f5df4cbd365af1d (InJesterr)

I find this proposal very urgent & fully believe that this is what the DAO needs to keep the GSS.

I wan't to make the GSS an official squad of the DAO, by giving them a certain amount of salary monthly each all equally paid with tasks that are written so that we can have both rules, safety & certainty to not lose them.

This way they don't have to apply for grants like grantees & we know exactly what they stand for.

What are the tasks going to be?

• The GSS will operate as an official team just like the DAO comittee, SAB & RC.
• They will give new grantees a warm welcome and handful tips & advice after their grant passes.
• On the first meeting the grantee is given 30 days to create a public roadmap on the GSS notion.
• The GSS follow all the grantees updates, Its important to follow and guide the grantees during their period by giving them a scheduling monthly meetings after each update.
• The GSS must process formal requests. When a Formal request is sent, The GSS can determine if its necessary to build the case.
• The GSS is holding weekly testdays with projects that needs to be tested.
• The GSS is accountable to verify metrics of grantees.

What are the rules going to be?

• The GSS helps people to create a public roadmap.
• The GSS will then verify and check grantees on monthly meetings to reach their goals on their roadmap.
  1. If a deadline isn't met the GSS needs to verify if its possible to continue with the project, if the project cannot continue they can build a proposal pausing the grant immediately and send it to the RC after voting is done.
  2. If a deadline isn't met but the grantees tells its possible to work around it to still continue with the project the GSS needs to keep an close eye on this subject for the upcomming meeting
  3. If a deadline isn't met and the grantee tells that it will be done the with in a new time frame, The GSS needs to discuss firmly with the grantee about a new date and point a new date which will be final.
• The GSS points out 1 Coordinator among them and select up to 4 max grant managers.
  1. Coordinator
  2. Sr. Grant & Acountability Manager
  3. (3) Grant Manager
• The GSS works as transparent as possible.
• The GSS meetings must be availible in English ( or the grantee needs to bring a translator ) to communicate.
• The GSS is able to coordinate and schedule meetings with grantees on multiple timezones
• When the Acountability Manager is building a case after a formal request, They can start a proposal of 3-7 days to determine together with the community wether it needs to be sent to the RC or not.
  1. The proposal needs to include a link to the Formal Request.
  2. The proposal needs to inculde a reply formal reply from a Grantee.
  3. The proposal needs to include only objective material.
• When scheduling a testday it must be done coordinated with the grantee first.
• Collecting data for Metrics must be FREE and accessible by everyone just like https://dcl-metrics.com/, This way everyone in the community can verify transparently if this is correct or not.

When voting yes you get 7 salary options to apply for the members of the GSS

1. 2,500$
2. 2,250$
3. 2,000$
4. 1,750$
5. 1,500$
6. 1,250$
7. 1,000$

• Invalid Question/Option.

• Yes, I vote that the official GSS gets paid 2,500$ monthly
• Yes, I vote that the official GSS gets paid 2,250$ monthly
• Yes, I vote that the official GSS gets paid 2,000$ monthly
• Yes, I vote that the official GSS gets paid 1,750$ monthly
• Yes, I vote that the official GSS gets paid 1,500$ monthly
• Yes, I vote that the official GSS gets paid 1,250$ monthly
• Yes, I vote that the official GSS gets paid 1,000$ monthly
• Invalid question/options

This proposal is summarized due to technical limitations. To view it complete and vote on it, visit the DCL DAO Governance dApp