Should employees of Decentraland be allowed to form partnerships and profit without DAO approval?
by 0x3611e64432fc741d094243457ad2a904e7ede8ab
I can't see any governance vote for this partnership with the Australian Open: https://cryptopotato.com/australian-open-joins-the-metaverse-by-partnering-with-decentraland/ https://www.gizmodo.com.au/2022/01/australian-open-nft-metaverse/ https://twitter.com/AOmetaverse
However the Australian Open believes they have a formal partnership with Decentraland organised by someone representing themselves as the Head Of Partnerships: https://au.linkedin.com/in/adecata https://twitter.com/CoinDesk/status/1479246753182400517
There are two options here, either Adam is an employee of Decentraland in which case his private company RunItWild is profiting from the NFT project he organised OR he is not and the Australian Open was deceived.
- Employees can profit from side hustles
- Employees must run everything past the DAO
- Adam is not an employee, AO was deceived
- Invalid question/options
Off-Chain Vote
Employees can profit from side hustles
0.17 0%
Employees must run everything past the DAO
189.44K 27%
Adam is not an employee, AO was deceived
0.69 0%
Invalid question/options
511.25K 73%
Timeline
Jan 11, 2022Proposal created
Jan 11, 2022Proposal vote started
Jan 18, 2022Proposal vote ended
Oct 26, 2023Proposal updated