Should we include the pool size when balancing the STBZ emissions

The current STBZ emission model tries to achieve that the STBZ reward varies only based on how close the stablecoin is to its peg. The higher the stablecoin is above its peg, the less reward it should get, the lower, the more reward it should get.

However, the current implementation does not factor in the size of the pools when balancing the STBZ emissions based on the price. This has the effect that funds in a pool with a small pool size might get a higher yield even if the price is higher compared with a pool with a large size & low price per stablecoin. The more users switch to a higher yield pool , the lower gets the yield of that pool, which hinders the aimed stabilization & gives users uncertainty about switching.

It is therefore suggested to factor in the pool size in combination with the current price-dependent method.