• © Goverland Inc. 2026
  • v1.0.3
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
Stake DAOStake DAOby0x464a70170d0469b5b325e4FBA0386133509e615f0x464a…615f

SDIP #2.3 - What sdveCRV/CRV split is appropriate?

Voting ended over 4 years agoSucceeded

https://gov.stakedao.org/t/sdip-2-implement-a-sdvecrv-balancer-pool/312/14

2.1 - Should we implement a sdveCRV/CRV pool? Result: Passed (YES)

2.2 - How should PPS related pools be incentivised? (Result: Pending)

2.3 What sdveCRV/CRV split is appropriate? (Result: Pending)

Options (in chronological order):

  1. 90/10 sdveCRV/CRV
  2. 80/20 sdveCRV/CRV
  3. 70/30 sdveCRV/CRV
  4. 60/40 sdveCRV/CRV
  5. 50/50 sdveCRV/CRV

Off-Chain Vote

Option 1
114.34K 98.5%
Option 2
1.64K 1.4%
Option 3
142.02 0.1%
Option 4
3.38 0%
Option 5
5.58 0%
Download mobile app to vote

Timeline

May 24, 2021Proposal created
May 24, 2021Proposal vote started
May 25, 2021Proposal vote ended
Oct 26, 2023Proposal updated