Proposals should have extra vetting before put to public forum

As the title suggests, I propose that the number of proposals is becoming untenable, and the quality or feasibility of some proposals are not worth raising to a public committee.

I understand as holders we all have the right to air our suggestions and opinions, however there have been a number of questionable proposals lately. For example:

• Unfairly skewing rewards towards original vamp holders and excluding bat or vampiress holders, who are all a part of this community.
• Misunderstanding the point of proposals and raising items that should be in the Community Suggestions discord channel
• Duplicate or similar proposals

Poor quality or an unnecessarily high number of proposals could lead to voter apathy, or some proposals being passed with a low number of votes due to holders ignoring the proposal instead of actively voting 'Against' it.

My suggestion is that proposals should be sent via a Google Form or web submission form so that a team of SVS holders can decide whether these should be published for voting. This will ensure worthwhile proposals are raised, and a quality of proposals is maintained.

Potentially, an option would be to publish a list so we can still see the rejected proposals, so there are no questions of unfairly dismissed ideas/suggestions that were not bought forward for public voting.

-- This is not trying to hinder people's voices or opinions, just avoiding unrealistic proposals, duplicates etc --