Bunni's current architecture, designed with a trustless-first approach, does not support automated liquidity management. This means that when pools with gauges fall outside their designated range, they must be decommissioned. Subsequently, projects and liquidity providers (LPs) are left without an in-range pool on Bunni for the same pair. This situation results in a disruption period where capital cannot be effectively utilized, thereby creating a potential risk of Total Value Locked (TVL) loss. Also, during this disruption period, the incentives linked to a gauge of an out-of-range pair are wasted. Consequently, I propose for the community to weigh the pros and cons of fast-tracking Gauge Replacement TRCS (GRTRC) processes to prevent such disruptions.